Difference between revisions of "Kamarainen2019"
BogdanaHuma (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2019-05-07 11:23:06) |
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
− | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
− | | | + | |Author(s)=Anniina Kämäräinen; Piia Björn; Lasse Eronen; Eija Kärnä; |
|Title=Managing epistemic imbalances in peer interaction during mathematics lessons | |Title=Managing epistemic imbalances in peer interaction during mathematics lessons | ||
− | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; epistemic imbalance; epistemics; mathematics; peer interaction; classroom interaction; Finnish; educational settings; | |
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; epistemic imbalance; epistemics; mathematics; peer interaction; classroom interaction; Finnish; educational settings; | + | |Key=Kamarainen2019 |
− | | | ||
|Year=2019 | |Year=2019 | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies |
Revision as of 07:48, 7 May 2019
Kamarainen2019 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Kamarainen2019 |
Author(s) | Anniina Kämäräinen, Piia Björn, Lasse Eronen, Eija Kärnä |
Title | Managing epistemic imbalances in peer interaction during mathematics lessons |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, epistemic imbalance, epistemics, mathematics, peer interaction, classroom interaction, Finnish, educational settings |
Publisher | |
Year | 2019 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Discourse Studies |
Volume | 21 |
Number | 3 |
Pages | 280-299 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/1461445619829236 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
In this study, we investigated how students manage their lack of/insufficient understanding of the content of a mathematical task with the aim of reaching shared understanding and epistemic balance in peer interaction. The data consist of recordings collected during a mathematics project (6 × 75 minutes) in a Finnish lower secondary school. The findings, drawing on conversation analysis, showed two markedly different sequence trajectories: (1) how interaction between a K+ and a K− (more/less knowledgeable) student proceeded relatively smoothly when these positions were accepted by both participants, and consequently the K+ led epistemic work by designing turns that resembled teachers’ practices; and (2) how the K+/K− interaction became extended when a K− challenged the K+’s knowledge claims, and furthermore, how a K− steered the epistemic work using polar and wh-interrogatives. The findings contribute to a better understanding of the ways the management of epistemic imbalance can progress during peer group work.
Notes