Stivers2022a

From emcawiki
Revision as of 00:24, 16 August 2022 by SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2022-08-16 12:24:16)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Stivers2022a
BibType BOOK
Key Stivers2022a
Author(s) Tanya Stivers
Title The book of answers: alignment, autonomy, and affiliation in social interaction
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Answers, Questions, Response, Recipiency, Affiliation, Alignment, Possibility Space
Publisher Oxford University Press
Year 2022
Language
City New York
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages
URL
DOI
ISBN 978-0-19-756389-2
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition 1
Series Foundations of human interaction
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

When someone poses a yes-no question to another person, norms of conversation kick in, and a wide yet bounded possibility space of responses emerges. This book relies on a large database of spontaneous naturally occurring recordings of conversations in English to first examine the questions that occasion responses and then to focus on the main response types-non-answer and answer responses. This allows us to identify the dimensions that provide the response possibility space's shape and boundaries. This book shows that confirming answers are of three main types-interjections, repetitions, and transformations-each of which has subtypes. Over a series of chapters, the book discusses each answer type and examine the contexts in which speakers rely on them. When interactants rely on a given answer, we can see that they adopt a position that is best analyzed not by reference to a single most common answer form but by reference to where it sits in the larger possibility space-the same possibility space that interactants hear a given response by reference to. Using this approach, the book shows that question recipients are concerned with alignment, autonomy, and affiliation, each conceptualized as a continuum. Interactants rely on the design of their answer turns in ways that at times accept trade-offs between these three types of cooperation. This approach helps us to see how even something as mundane as simple questions and answers are resources that we use to manage our social relationships, bringing us closer or pushing us further apart, moment-by-moment–

Notes