Difference between revisions of "Lee2011"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - "Conversation analysis" to "Conversation Analysis")
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Seung-Hee Lee;
 
|Author(s)=Seung-Hee Lee;
 
|Title=Responding at a higher level: Activity progressivity in calls for service
 
|Title=Responding at a higher level: Activity progressivity in calls for service
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation analysis; Institutional interaction; Preference; Progressivity; Responses; Type-conformity;
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Institutional interaction; Preference; Progressivity; Responses; Type-conformity;
 
|Key=Lee2011
 
|Key=Lee2011
 
|Year=2011
 
|Year=2011

Revision as of 13:29, 17 May 2018

Lee2011
BibType ARTICLE
Key Lee2011
Author(s) Seung-Hee Lee
Title Responding at a higher level: Activity progressivity in calls for service
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Institutional interaction, Preference, Progressivity, Responses, Type-conformity
Publisher
Year 2011
Language
City
Month
Journal Journal of Pragmatics
Volume 43
Number
Pages 904–917
URL
DOI doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.028
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In a set of calls to an airline service in which agents ask for customers’ identifying information, some customers respond by providing different, unrequested information. This paper examines these non-direct, nonconforming responses and shows that those customers anticipate hierarchical institution-specific stages in the activity and respond to the higher-level purpose for which the question was produced. Customers thereby promote the progress of the larger activity in an institutionally relevantway. This suggests that participants can depart from type-conformity with an orientation to activity progressivity.

Notes