Ruhlemann2019

From emcawiki
Revision as of 04:52, 17 July 2019 by SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2019-07-17 10:52:40)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Ruhlemann2019
BibType ARTICLE
Key Ruhlemann2019
Author(s) Christoph Rühlemann, Matt Gee, Alexander Ptak
Title Alternating Gaze in Multi-Party Storytelling
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Gaze alternation, Inclusion, Stance, Storytelling, Storytelling components, XML
Publisher
Year 2019
Language
City
Month aug
Journal Journal of Pragmatics
Volume 149
Number
Pages 91-113
URL
DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.06.001
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

We present a single case study on gaze alternation in three-party storytelling. The study makes use of the XML method, a `combinatorial approach' (Haugh and Musgrave, 2019) involving multi-modal CA transcription converted into the XML syntax. We approach gaze alternation via (i) the addressee-status hypothesis, (ii) the texturing hypothesis, and (iii) the acceleration hypothesis. Hypothesis (i) proposes that the storyteller alternatingly looks at the recipients not only when their addressee status is symmetrical but also when their addressee status is asymmetrical. Hypothesis (ii) predicts that gaze alternation `textures' the telling by occurring when the storytelling progresses from one segment to another. Hypothesis (iii) states that gaze alternation accelerates toward Climax and decelerates in Post-completion sequences. The analyses support the hypotheses. They suggest that alternating gaze works against the danger of exclusion caused by the dyadic structure of conversation. It further partakes in story organization as it occurs at points of transition from one story section to another section. Finally, accelerated gaze alternation constitutes an indexical process drawing the recipients' attention to the immediate relevance of stance display (Stivers, 2008). We conclude that the three hypotheses warrant further investigation to determine their generalizability across speakers and speech situations.

Notes