Roberts2004a

From emcawiki
Revision as of 02:29, 11 December 2018 by SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2018-12-11 08:29:42)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Roberts2004a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Roberts2004a
Author(s) Felicia Roberts
Title Interobserver Agreement on First-Stage Conversation Analytic Transcription
Editor(s)
Tag(s) Interobserver Agreement, Transcription, EMCA, Methodology
Publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
Year 2004
Language
City
Month jul
Journal Human Communication Research
Volume 30
Number 3
Pages 376–410
URL
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00737.x
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This investigation assesses interobserver agreement on conversation analytic (CA) transcription. Four professional CA transcribers spent a maximum of 3 hours transcribing 2.5 minutes of a previously unknown, naturally occurring, mundane telephone call. Researchers unitized transcripts into words, sounds, silences, inbreaths, outbreaths, and laugh tokens, and then coded each of 1,827 units on as many as 15 transcription dimensions. Agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa for nominal level data: Speaker designation, unit sequencing, semantics, orthography, cutoff, and plosiveness reached the level of “substantial” agreement (90% or greater accuracy). Pitch, overlap, doubt, and smile voice reached the level of “moderate” agreement (80–89% accuracy), while pace, sound stretch, underline/amplitude, and intonation fell below acceptability except when examined post hoc as presence versus absence of the feature. Silence lengths, examined as ratio‐level data, were reliable at the “acceptable” level (alpha >.70) among those using a counting method (as opposed to stopwatch or other mechanical means). We make recommendations for transcription training.

Notes