Difference between revisions of "Rawls1996a"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Anne Warfield Rawls; |Title=Durkheim's epistemology: The neglected argument |Tag(s)=EMCA; Durkheim; Epistemology; Basic Resources; |Ke...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Anne Warfield Rawls; | + | |Author(s)=Anne Warfield Rawls; |
| − | |Title=Durkheim's epistemology: | + | |Title=Durkheim's epistemology: the neglected argument |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Durkheim; Epistemology; Basic Resources; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Durkheim; Epistemology; Basic Resources; |
|Key=Rawls1996a | |Key=Rawls1996a | ||
|Year=1996 | |Year=1996 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Journal=American Journal of Sociology | |Journal=American Journal of Sociology | ||
|Volume=102 | |Volume=102 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=2 |
| + | |Pages=430–482 | ||
|URL=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/230952 | |URL=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/230952 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1086/230952 | ||
|Abstract=Durkheim's epistemology, the argument for the social origins of the categories of the understanding, is his most important and most neglected argument. This argument has been confused with his sociology of knowledge, and Durkheim's overall position has been misunderstood as a consequence. The current popularity of a "cultural" or "ideological" interpretation of Durkheim is as much a misunderstanding of his position as the "functional" interpretation from which the current interpretations seek to rescue him. Durkheim articulated a sophisticated epistemology in the classical sense, a point that has been entirely missed. | |Abstract=Durkheim's epistemology, the argument for the social origins of the categories of the understanding, is his most important and most neglected argument. This argument has been confused with his sociology of knowledge, and Durkheim's overall position has been misunderstood as a consequence. The current popularity of a "cultural" or "ideological" interpretation of Durkheim is as much a misunderstanding of his position as the "functional" interpretation from which the current interpretations seek to rescue him. Durkheim articulated a sophisticated epistemology in the classical sense, a point that has been entirely missed. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:56, 24 October 2019
| Rawls1996a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Rawls1996a |
| Author(s) | Anne Warfield Rawls |
| Title | Durkheim's epistemology: the neglected argument |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Durkheim, Epistemology, Basic Resources |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1996 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | American Journal of Sociology |
| Volume | 102 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 430–482 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1086/230952 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Error in widget Iframe: unable to write file /home2/ogviwsmy/public_html/emcawiki/extensions/Widgets/compiled_templates/wrt662de7142da439_70707654
Abstract
Durkheim's epistemology, the argument for the social origins of the categories of the understanding, is his most important and most neglected argument. This argument has been confused with his sociology of knowledge, and Durkheim's overall position has been misunderstood as a consequence. The current popularity of a "cultural" or "ideological" interpretation of Durkheim is as much a misunderstanding of his position as the "functional" interpretation from which the current interpretations seek to rescue him. Durkheim articulated a sophisticated epistemology in the classical sense, a point that has been entirely missed.
Notes
