Difference between revisions of "Psathas1999"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=George Psathas; |Title=Studying the organization in action: Membership categorization and interaction |Tag(s)=EMCA; Membership Categori...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=George Psathas;  
+
|Author(s)=George Psathas;
|Title=Studying the organization in action: Membership categorization and interaction
+
|Title=Studying the organization in action: membership categorization and interaction
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Membership Categorization; Ethnomethodology; Conversation Analysis; Institutional interaction;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Membership Categorization; Ethnomethodology; Conversation Analysis; Institutional interaction;
 
|Key=Psathas1999
 
|Key=Psathas1999
 
|Year=1999
 
|Year=1999
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Journal=Human Studies
 
|Journal=Human Studies
 
|Volume=22
 
|Volume=22
 +
|Number=2-4
 
|Pages=139-162
 
|Pages=139-162
 
|URL=https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023/A:1005422932589.pdf
 
|URL=https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023/A:1005422932589.pdf
|Abstract=A current set of concerns in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis includes
+
|DOI=10.1023/A:1005422932589
the question of how conversation analysis (CA) can deal with studies of social structure or
+
|Abstract=A current set of concerns in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis includes the question of how conversation analysis (CA) can deal with studies of social structure or studies of talk in institutional settings.
studies of talk in institutional settings. In this paper a focus is placed on how the
+
 
accomplishment of “work” and “categorization” are interrelated. Two particular instances
+
In this paper a focus is placed on how the accomplishment of "work" and "categorization" are interrelated. Two particular instances are examined: a ski school and a package delivery service. Membership categorization is shown to be a complex, on-going, interactive accomplishment. The parties act in ways that are "predicatively-bound" (i.e. predicates of action, rights, obligations, etc.) which allow inferences to be made by each of the parties about the other based on these actions; these enable each to accept/confirm/validate the other's self-categorization and to produce, via their own actions, activities that are congruent with the other's self-categorization. Activities of the parties are category-relevant and category-generative. Thus, "work" or "the work of the organization", (e.g. for Choice, a package delivery service), is being accomplished in and through the talk and interaction of the parties.
are examined: a ski school and a package delivery service. Membership categorization is
 
shown to be a complex, on-going, interactive accomplishment. The parties act in ways that
 
are “predicatively-bound” (i.e. predicates of action, rights, obligations, etc.) which allow
 
inferences to be made by each of the parties about the other based on these actions; these
 
enable each to accept/confirm/validate the other’s self-categorization and to produce, via
 
their own actions, activities that are congruent with the other’s self-categorization. Activities
 
of the parties are category-relevant and category-generative. Thus, “work” or “the work of
 
the organization”, (e.g. for Choice, a package delivery service), is being accomplished in
 
and through the talk and interaction of the parties.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 05:56, 19 October 2019

Psathas1999
BibType ARTICLE
Key Psathas1999
Author(s) George Psathas
Title Studying the organization in action: membership categorization and interaction
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Membership Categorization, Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis, Institutional interaction
Publisher
Year 1999
Language English
City
Month
Journal Human Studies
Volume 22
Number 2-4
Pages 139-162
URL Link
DOI 10.1023/A:1005422932589
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

A current set of concerns in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis includes the question of how conversation analysis (CA) can deal with studies of social structure or studies of talk in institutional settings.

In this paper a focus is placed on how the accomplishment of "work" and "categorization" are interrelated. Two particular instances are examined: a ski school and a package delivery service. Membership categorization is shown to be a complex, on-going, interactive accomplishment. The parties act in ways that are "predicatively-bound" (i.e. predicates of action, rights, obligations, etc.) which allow inferences to be made by each of the parties about the other based on these actions; these enable each to accept/confirm/validate the other's self-categorization and to produce, via their own actions, activities that are congruent with the other's self-categorization. Activities of the parties are category-relevant and category-generative. Thus, "work" or "the work of the organization", (e.g. for Choice, a package delivery service), is being accomplished in and through the talk and interaction of the parties.

Notes