Pilnick2002a
Revision as of 13:22, 18 May 2018 by DarceySearles (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Alison Pilnick; |Title=What 'most people' do: Exploring the ethical implications of genetic counselling |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; Con...")
| Pilnick2002a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Pilnick2002a |
| Author(s) | Alison Pilnick |
| Title | What 'most people' do: Exploring the ethical implications of genetic counselling |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Medical EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Genetic Counseling, Ethics |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2002 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | New Genetics & Society |
| Volume | 21 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 339-350 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/14636770216003 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Genetic counselling, and the ethical principles of non-directiveness and client autonomy that counsellors aspire to, are a cornerstone in the defence of genetic practice against accusations of eugenics. This paper examines the practical application of these principles using a conversation analytic approach, arguing that there is a need to pay greater attention to local interactional contexts in analysing counsellors' attainment or otherwise of ethical ideals.
Notes
