Difference between revisions of "Mair2018"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Michael Mair; Chris Elsey; Paul V. Smith; Patrick G. Watson; |Title=War on video: Combat footage, vernacular video analysis and military...")
 
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Volume=15
 
|Volume=15
 
|Pages=83-105
 
|Pages=83-105
|URL=https://zenodo.org/record/1475784#.W9lz9yDZBaQ
+
|URL=https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1475784
 
|DOI=10.5281/zenodo.1475784
 
|DOI=10.5281/zenodo.1475784
 
|Abstract=In this article we present an ethnomethodological study of a controversial case of ‘friendly fire’ from the Iraq War in which leaked video footage, war on video, acquired particular significance. We examine testimony given during a United States Air Force (USAF) investigation of the incident alongside transcribed excerpts from the video to make visible the methods employed by the investigators to assess the propriety of the actions of the pilots involved. With a focus on the way in which the USAF investigators pursued their own analysis of language-in-use in their discussions with the pilots about what had been captured on the video, we turn attention to the background expectancies that analytical work was grounded in. These ‘vernacular’ forms of video analysis and the expectancies which inform them constitute, we suggest, an inquiry into military culture from within that culture. As such, attending to them provides insights into that culture.
 
|Abstract=In this article we present an ethnomethodological study of a controversial case of ‘friendly fire’ from the Iraq War in which leaked video footage, war on video, acquired particular significance. We examine testimony given during a United States Air Force (USAF) investigation of the incident alongside transcribed excerpts from the video to make visible the methods employed by the investigators to assess the propriety of the actions of the pilots involved. With a focus on the way in which the USAF investigators pursued their own analysis of language-in-use in their discussions with the pilots about what had been captured on the video, we turn attention to the background expectancies that analytical work was grounded in. These ‘vernacular’ forms of video analysis and the expectancies which inform them constitute, we suggest, an inquiry into military culture from within that culture. As such, attending to them provides insights into that culture.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 10:24, 8 November 2018

Mair2018
BibType ARTICLE
Key Mair2018
Author(s) Michael Mair, Chris Elsey, Paul V. Smith, Patrick G. Watson
Title War on video: Combat footage, vernacular video analysis and military culture from within
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Military, War, Combat, Video
Publisher
Year 2018
Language English
City
Month
Journal Ethnographic Studies
Volume 15
Number
Pages 83-105
URL Link
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.1475784
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In this article we present an ethnomethodological study of a controversial case of ‘friendly fire’ from the Iraq War in which leaked video footage, war on video, acquired particular significance. We examine testimony given during a United States Air Force (USAF) investigation of the incident alongside transcribed excerpts from the video to make visible the methods employed by the investigators to assess the propriety of the actions of the pilots involved. With a focus on the way in which the USAF investigators pursued their own analysis of language-in-use in their discussions with the pilots about what had been captured on the video, we turn attention to the background expectancies that analytical work was grounded in. These ‘vernacular’ forms of video analysis and the expectancies which inform them constitute, we suggest, an inquiry into military culture from within that culture. As such, attending to them provides insights into that culture.

Notes