Difference between revisions of "Luke-Zhang2007"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)= K.K. Luke; Wei Zhang;
+
|Author(s)=Kang-kwong Luke; Wei Zhang;
 
|Title=Retrospective turn continuations in Mandarin Chinese conversation
 
|Title=Retrospective turn continuations in Mandarin Chinese conversation
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Right Dislocation; Prosody; Syntax; Chinese; Mandarin; Turn-taking
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Right Dislocation; Prosody; Syntax; Chinese; Mandarin; Turn-taking
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=17
 
|Volume=17
 
|Number=4
 
|Number=4
|Pages=605-635
+
|Pages=605–635
 +
|URL=https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.17.4.04luk
 
|DOI=10.1075/prag.17.4.04luk
 
|DOI=10.1075/prag.17.4.04luk
|Abstract=How the status of further talk past the point of a turn’s possible completion should be described, and what functions different kinds of turn continuation might serve – these are questions that have engaged many scholars since Sacks, Schegloff and Jefferson’s turn-taking model (1974). In this paper, a general scheme is proposed with which one can tease out four interlocking strands in analyzing different kinds of turn continuation: Syntactic continuity vs. discontinuity, main vs. subordinate intonation, retrospective vs. prospective orientation, and information focus vs. non-focus. These parameters combine to form different configurations and interact in interesting ways, accounting for different kinds of turn continuation. The scheme is tested on, and illustrated with, a body of naturally occurring conversational data in Chinese.  
+
|Abstract=How the status of further talk past the point of a turn’s possible completion should be described, and what functions different kinds of turn continuation might serve – these are questions that have engaged many scholars since Sacks, Schegloff and Jefferson’s turn-taking model (1974). In this paper, a general scheme is proposed with which one can tease out four interlocking strands in analyzing different kinds of turn continuation: Syntactic continuity vs. discontinuity, main vs. subordinate intonation, retrospective vs. prospective orientation, and information focus vs. non-focus. These parameters combine to form different configurations and interact in interesting ways, accounting for different kinds of turn continuation. The scheme is tested on, and illustrated with, a body of naturally occurring conversational data in Chinese.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 12:23, 18 November 2019

Luke-Zhang2007
BibType ARTICLE
Key Luke-Zhang2007
Author(s) Kang-kwong Luke, Wei Zhang
Title Retrospective turn continuations in Mandarin Chinese conversation
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Right Dislocation, Prosody, Syntax, Chinese, Mandarin, Turn-taking
Publisher
Year 2007
Language
City
Month
Journal Pragmatics
Volume 17
Number 4
Pages 605–635
URL Link
DOI 10.1075/prag.17.4.04luk
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

How the status of further talk past the point of a turn’s possible completion should be described, and what functions different kinds of turn continuation might serve – these are questions that have engaged many scholars since Sacks, Schegloff and Jefferson’s turn-taking model (1974). In this paper, a general scheme is proposed with which one can tease out four interlocking strands in analyzing different kinds of turn continuation: Syntactic continuity vs. discontinuity, main vs. subordinate intonation, retrospective vs. prospective orientation, and information focus vs. non-focus. These parameters combine to form different configurations and interact in interesting ways, accounting for different kinds of turn continuation. The scheme is tested on, and illustrated with, a body of naturally occurring conversational data in Chinese.

Notes