Difference between revisions of "Kjos2014"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Peder Kjøs; Odd Arne Tjersland; Katrina Roen |Title=The Mediation Window: Regulation of Argumentation and Affect in Custody Mediation |...") |
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Peder Kjøs; Odd Arne Tjersland; Katrina Roen | |Author(s)=Peder Kjøs; Odd Arne Tjersland; Katrina Roen | ||
|Title=The Mediation Window: Regulation of Argumentation and Affect in Custody Mediation | |Title=The Mediation Window: Regulation of Argumentation and Affect in Custody Mediation | ||
− | |Key= | + | |Key=Kjos2014 |
|Year=2014 | |Year=2014 | ||
|Journal=Journal of Divorce & Remarriage | |Journal=Journal of Divorce & Remarriage | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|DOI=10.1080/10502556.2014.950901 | |DOI=10.1080/10502556.2014.950901 | ||
|Abstract=High-conflict custody mediation requires working with both the emotional and the factual aspects of the conflict, while balancing unequal power relations between parents. Applying conversation analysis methods to a case of “treatment as usual” high-conflict mediation, this study offers an analysis of the process of establishing a balance point—the mediation window—where both emotional and practical concerns can be discussed efficiently. Communication patterns in the selected case are compared to an extract of the remaining corpus from which it is drawn, consisting of 38 high-conflict mediation cases. Findings are discussed with respect to the practice and ideology of custody mediation, particularly concerning empowerment, self-determination, and mediator control. | |Abstract=High-conflict custody mediation requires working with both the emotional and the factual aspects of the conflict, while balancing unequal power relations between parents. Applying conversation analysis methods to a case of “treatment as usual” high-conflict mediation, this study offers an analysis of the process of establishing a balance point—the mediation window—where both emotional and practical concerns can be discussed efficiently. Communication patterns in the selected case are compared to an extract of the remaining corpus from which it is drawn, consisting of 38 high-conflict mediation cases. Findings are discussed with respect to the practice and ideology of custody mediation, particularly concerning empowerment, self-determination, and mediator control. | ||
− | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 06:08, 1 October 2014
Kjos2014 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Kjos2014 |
Author(s) | Peder Kjøs, Odd Arne Tjersland, Katrina Roen |
Title | The Mediation Window: Regulation of Argumentation and Affect in Custody Mediation |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | |
Publisher | |
Year | 2014 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Journal of Divorce & Remarriage |
Volume | 55 |
Number | 7 |
Pages | 627-538 |
URL | |
DOI | 10.1080/10502556.2014.950901 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
High-conflict custody mediation requires working with both the emotional and the factual aspects of the conflict, while balancing unequal power relations between parents. Applying conversation analysis methods to a case of “treatment as usual” high-conflict mediation, this study offers an analysis of the process of establishing a balance point—the mediation window—where both emotional and practical concerns can be discussed efficiently. Communication patterns in the selected case are compared to an extract of the remaining corpus from which it is drawn, consisting of 38 high-conflict mediation cases. Findings are discussed with respect to the practice and ideology of custody mediation, particularly concerning empowerment, self-determination, and mediator control.
Notes