Difference between revisions of "Collins2005b"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Sarah Collins; Paul Drew; Ian Watt; Vikki Entwistle |Title="Unilateral" and "bilateral" practitioner approaches in decision-making about...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Sarah Collins; Paul Drew; Ian Watt; Vikki Entwistle | |Author(s)=Sarah Collins; Paul Drew; Ian Watt; Vikki Entwistle | ||
| − | |Title= | + | |Title='Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; Doctor-patient interaction; Medical consultations; Decision-Making; Patient Participation; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; Doctor-patient interaction; Medical consultations; Decision-Making; Patient Participation; |
|Key=Collins2005b | |Key=Collins2005b | ||
|Year=2005 | |Year=2005 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=61 | |Volume=61 | ||
|Number=12 | |Number=12 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=2611–2627 |
|URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953605002340 | |URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953605002340 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.047 |
|Abstract=Practitioners can present and discuss decisions about the management of health problems in a variety of ways during consultations. This paper examines in detail how doctors talk with patients in relation to decision-making about treatment. Conversation analyses of decision-making sequences in consultations about diabetes in primary care and about treatment of ear nose and throat (ENT) cancer in a specialist oncology setting, both in the UK, revealed a spectrum of practitioner approaches ranging from more ‘bilateral’ to more ‘unilateral’. This paper identifies the key communicative and organisational features of these approaches and provides some preliminary observations about the implications of these for patient participation in decision-making. | |Abstract=Practitioners can present and discuss decisions about the management of health problems in a variety of ways during consultations. This paper examines in detail how doctors talk with patients in relation to decision-making about treatment. Conversation analyses of decision-making sequences in consultations about diabetes in primary care and about treatment of ear nose and throat (ENT) cancer in a specialist oncology setting, both in the UK, revealed a spectrum of practitioner approaches ranging from more ‘bilateral’ to more ‘unilateral’. This paper identifies the key communicative and organisational features of these approaches and provides some preliminary observations about the implications of these for patient participation in decision-making. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:02, 3 November 2019
| Collins2005b | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Collins2005b |
| Author(s) | Sarah Collins, Paul Drew, Ian Watt, Vikki Entwistle |
| Title | 'Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Medical EMCA, Doctor-patient interaction, Medical consultations, Decision-Making, Patient Participation |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2005 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Social Science & Medicine |
| Volume | 61 |
| Number | 12 |
| Pages | 2611–2627 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.047 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Practitioners can present and discuss decisions about the management of health problems in a variety of ways during consultations. This paper examines in detail how doctors talk with patients in relation to decision-making about treatment. Conversation analyses of decision-making sequences in consultations about diabetes in primary care and about treatment of ear nose and throat (ENT) cancer in a specialist oncology setting, both in the UK, revealed a spectrum of practitioner approaches ranging from more ‘bilateral’ to more ‘unilateral’. This paper identifies the key communicative and organisational features of these approaches and provides some preliminary observations about the implications of these for patient participation in decision-making.
Notes
