Tadic2024

From emcawiki
Revision as of 08:59, 20 February 2023 by SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2023-02-20 07:59:40)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Tadic2024
BibType ARTICLE
Key Tadic2023
Author(s) Nadja Tadic
Title Preference organization and possible -isms in institutional interaction: The case of adult second language classrooms
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, isms, racism, classism, sexism, preference organization, preference, MCA, Membership Categorization
Publisher
Year 2023
Language
City
Month feb
Journal Language in Society
Volume
Number
Pages 1–27
URL Link
DOI 10.1017/S0047404523000015
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This study examines preference organization in adult second language classrooms in relation to possible -isms—utterances which are hearably racist, classist, (hetero)sexist, or otherwise exclusionary, although their exclusionary nature may be (re)negotiated in situ. A collection of sixty-one possible -isms from a corpus of fifty-five hours of video-recorded English second language classes was examined using conversation analysis and membership categorization analysis. The analysis shows that participants orient to solidarity by supporting -isms, progressivity by deleting -isms, and moral accountability by challenging -isms; however, participants prioritize solidarity, enacting it early, even in cases of deletion and challenges. I argue that this preference organization is rooted in the institutional roles and objectives of adult second language classrooms, where presumably competent members of diverse cultures aim to foster an environment for active participation. Findings underscore the importance of conducting microanalyses of talk-in-interaction to uncover structural constraints which facilitate the reproduction of systemic exclusion. (-isms, preference, conversation analysis, membership categorization analysis, classroom interaction, exclusion in interaction)*

Notes

Publisher: Cambridge University Press