Nevile2007

From emcawiki
Revision as of 13:42, 8 September 2017 by DarceySearles (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Maurice Nevile; |Title=Talking without overlap in the airline cockpit: Precision timing at work |Tag(s)=EMCA; Aviation; Airline cockpit...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Nevile2007
BibType ARTICLE
Key Nevile2007
Author(s) Maurice Nevile
Title Talking without overlap in the airline cockpit: Precision timing at work
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Aviation, Airline cockpit, Overlap, Turn taking
Publisher
Year 2007
Language
City
Month
Journal Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies
Volume 27
Number
Pages 225-249
URL Link
DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.009.
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This study examines temporal organization for interaction in a specific work setting: the airline cockpit. It is generally concerned with precise timing for turn taking as a feature of competent conduct in collaborative professional work, and for creating an acceptable orderly flow of talk for tasks. Specifically, it pursues an observation that moments of overlapping talk, when two or more parties talk simultaneously, are rare in cockpit interaction. Pilots are instructed in training not to speak simultaneously; however, cockpit talk is highly conducive to overlap. Mostly pilots know who will say what to whom, and when, because they are legally required to use scripted procedural wordings. The trajectories of turns are predictable and projectable, and therefore are vulnerable to terminal overlap, when a recipient starts talking just as a current speaker is completing a turn. This does not happen, because airline pilots precisely time next talk to start at the actual, not projected, end of current talk. Pilots allow talk to emerge complete. Pilots orient to the strictly sequential nature of their work to accomplish conflicting setting-specific demands for talk, in situ and in real time. The paper uses transcriptions from audio and video recordings of pilots on actual passenger flights.

Notes