Difference between revisions of "Murphy2016"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=J. Murphy
 
|Author(s)=J. Murphy
 
|Title=Apologies made at the Leveson Inquiry: Triggers and responses
 
|Title=Apologies made at the Leveson Inquiry: Triggers and responses
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Apologies; Courtroom; Political communication;
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Apologies; Courtroom; Political communication; In Press; Needs Review;  
 
|Key=Murphy2016
 
|Key=Murphy2016
 
|Year=2016
 
|Year=2016

Revision as of 09:12, 9 August 2016

Murphy2016
BibType ARTICLE
Key Murphy2016
Author(s) J. Murphy
Title Apologies made at the Leveson Inquiry: Triggers and responses
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Apologies, Courtroom, Political communication, In Press, Needs Review
Publisher
Year 2016
Language
City
Month
Journal Pragmatics and Society
Volume
Number
Pages
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper discusses apologies made by politicians at a recent UK public inquiry, The Leveson Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press. I use the freely available data from the Inquiry to explore how politicians apologise in this interactional setting, contrasting it with more usual monologic political apologies. Firstly, I identify the sorts of actions which may be seen as apologisable. I then take a conversation analytic approach to explore how the apologies can come as a result of an overt complaint and how the apologies are reacted to by counsel and the Inquiry chair. I show that, unlike in everyday conversation, apologies are not the first pair parts of adjacency pairs (cf. Robinson, 2004), but rather form action chains (Pomerantz, 1978) where the absence of a response is unmarked. I conclude with some observations on how apology tokens may be losing their apologetic meaning.

Notes