Difference between revisions of "Due2022"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (SaulAlbert moved page Doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2022.2086059 to Due2022 without leaving a redirect: page titles should be made in the form AuthornameYYYY)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|Title=Guide dog versus robot dog: assembling visually impaired people with non-human agents and achieving assisted mobility through distributed co-constructed perception
 
|Title=Guide dog versus robot dog: assembling visually impaired people with non-human agents and achieving assisted mobility through distributed co-constructed perception
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
|Key=Doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2022.2086059
+
|Key=Due2022
 
|Publisher=Taylor & Francis
 
|Publisher=Taylor & Francis
 
|Year=2022
 
|Year=2022
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Journal=Mobilities
 
|Journal=Mobilities
 
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17450101.2022.2086059
 
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17450101.2022.2086059
 +
|DOI=10.1080/17450101.2022.2086059
 
|Abstract=Guide dogs are sense-able agents that can assist Visually Impaired Persons (VIP) to achieve mobility. But could a guide dog be replaced by a robot dog? Based on video recordings and ethnomethodological ‘conversation analysis’ of VIPs who are mobile in a street environment with a remotely operated robodog or a guide dog, respectively, this paper shows the multisensory and semiotic capacities of non-human agents as assistants in navigational activities. It also highlights the differences between their type of agency and sense-ability, and thus their different roles in situations of assisted mobility and disability mobility. This paper contributes to research in assisted and disability mobility between humans and non-humans by showing how they work not as individual agents, but as ‘VIP + guide dog’ and ‘VIP + robodog + operator’ assemblages, and by demonstrating that these assemblages distribute and co-construct the practical perception of the material world which is necessary for accomplishing mobility.
 
|Abstract=Guide dogs are sense-able agents that can assist Visually Impaired Persons (VIP) to achieve mobility. But could a guide dog be replaced by a robot dog? Based on video recordings and ethnomethodological ‘conversation analysis’ of VIPs who are mobile in a street environment with a remotely operated robodog or a guide dog, respectively, this paper shows the multisensory and semiotic capacities of non-human agents as assistants in navigational activities. It also highlights the differences between their type of agency and sense-ability, and thus their different roles in situations of assisted mobility and disability mobility. This paper contributes to research in assisted and disability mobility between humans and non-humans by showing how they work not as individual agents, but as ‘VIP + guide dog’ and ‘VIP + robodog + operator’ assemblages, and by demonstrating that these assemblages distribute and co-construct the practical perception of the material world which is necessary for accomplishing mobility.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 06:33, 25 August 2022

Due2022
BibType ARTICLE
Key Due2022
Author(s) Brian L. Due
Title Guide dog versus robot dog: assembling visually impaired people with non-human agents and achieving assisted mobility through distributed co-constructed perception
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Year 2022
Language English
City
Month
Journal Mobilities
Volume
Number
Pages
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/17450101.2022.2086059
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Guide dogs are sense-able agents that can assist Visually Impaired Persons (VIP) to achieve mobility. But could a guide dog be replaced by a robot dog? Based on video recordings and ethnomethodological ‘conversation analysis’ of VIPs who are mobile in a street environment with a remotely operated robodog or a guide dog, respectively, this paper shows the multisensory and semiotic capacities of non-human agents as assistants in navigational activities. It also highlights the differences between their type of agency and sense-ability, and thus their different roles in situations of assisted mobility and disability mobility. This paper contributes to research in assisted and disability mobility between humans and non-humans by showing how they work not as individual agents, but as ‘VIP + guide dog’ and ‘VIP + robodog + operator’ assemblages, and by demonstrating that these assemblages distribute and co-construct the practical perception of the material world which is necessary for accomplishing mobility.

Notes