Difference between revisions of "Pomerantz2017"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Anita Pomerantz; |Title=Inferring the purpose of a prior query and responding accordingly |Editor(s)= Geoffrey Raymond; Gene H. Le...") |
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=INCOLLECTION | |BibType=INCOLLECTION | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Anita Pomerantz; | + | |Author(s)=Anita Pomerantz; |
|Title=Inferring the purpose of a prior query and responding accordingly | |Title=Inferring the purpose of a prior query and responding accordingly | ||
| − | |Editor(s)= Geoffrey Raymond; Gene H. Lerner; John Heritage; | + | |Editor(s)=Geoffrey Raymond; Gene H. Lerner; John Heritage; |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; conversation analysis; reasoning; bases of inferences; responses; questions; participants' analysis; purpose of question; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; conversation analysis; reasoning; bases of inferences; responses; questions; participants' analysis; purpose of question; Allusion |
|Key=Pomerantz2017 | |Key=Pomerantz2017 | ||
|Publisher=John Benjamins Publishing | |Publisher=John Benjamins Publishing | ||
|Year=2017 | |Year=2017 | ||
|Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia | |Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia | ||
| − | |Booktitle=Enabling Human Conduct: Studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff | + | |Booktitle=Enabling Human Conduct: Studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff |
|Pages=61–76 | |Pages=61–76 | ||
|DOI=10.1075/pbns.273.04pom | |DOI=10.1075/pbns.273.04pom | ||
|Abstract=The paper analyzes how recipients infer the purpose of a prior query. While such inferences are not directly observable, analyzing responses to queries sheds light on ways in which recipients likely understood them. The paper identifies three types of sequences in which recipients respond to the inferred purpose of the prior query. To infer a purpose of a query, recipients draw on the form of the query, the immediately prior interaction, and assumedly shared knowledge about the current situation. It concludes with a discussion of the relationship between inferring the purpose of a prior query and participants’ pervasively addressing the question ‘why that now’. | |Abstract=The paper analyzes how recipients infer the purpose of a prior query. While such inferences are not directly observable, analyzing responses to queries sheds light on ways in which recipients likely understood them. The paper identifies three types of sequences in which recipients respond to the inferred purpose of the prior query. To infer a purpose of a query, recipients draw on the form of the query, the immediately prior interaction, and assumedly shared knowledge about the current situation. It concludes with a discussion of the relationship between inferring the purpose of a prior query and participants’ pervasively addressing the question ‘why that now’. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 09:11, 24 August 2022
| Pomerantz2017 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Pomerantz2017 |
| Author(s) | Anita Pomerantz |
| Title | Inferring the purpose of a prior query and responding accordingly |
| Editor(s) | Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner, John Heritage |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, conversation analysis, reasoning, bases of inferences, responses, questions, participants' analysis, purpose of question, Allusion |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | |
| City | Amsterdam / Philadelphia |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 61–76 |
| URL | |
| DOI | 10.1075/pbns.273.04pom |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Enabling Human Conduct: Studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The paper analyzes how recipients infer the purpose of a prior query. While such inferences are not directly observable, analyzing responses to queries sheds light on ways in which recipients likely understood them. The paper identifies three types of sequences in which recipients respond to the inferred purpose of the prior query. To infer a purpose of a query, recipients draw on the form of the query, the immediately prior interaction, and assumedly shared knowledge about the current situation. It concludes with a discussion of the relationship between inferring the purpose of a prior query and participants’ pervasively addressing the question ‘why that now’.
Notes
