Difference between revisions of "Parry2004"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Ruth H. Parry; |Title=The interactional management of patients' physical incompetence: A conversation analytic study of physiotherapy i...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Ruth H. Parry; | + | |Author(s)=Ruth H. Parry; |
| − | |Title=The interactional management of patients' physical incompetence: | + | |Title=The interactional management of patients' physical incompetence: a conversation analytic study of physiotherapy interactions |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Medical EMCA; Incompetence; Physiotherapy; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Medical EMCA; Incompetence; Physiotherapy; |
|Key=Parry2004 | |Key=Parry2004 | ||
|Year=2004 | |Year=2004 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Journal=Sociology of Health & Illness | |Journal=Sociology of Health & Illness | ||
|Volume=26 | |Volume=26 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=7 |
| − | |URL= | + | |Pages=976–1007 |
| + | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00425.x | ||
|DOI=10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00425.x | |DOI=10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00425.x | ||
|Abstract=Patients’ physical incompetence is a feature of many clinical interactions; the challenges it presents are not only technical but also interactional. This paper examines how interpretations and interactional consequences of physical incompetence are dealt with during stroke physiotherapy. A conversation analytic approach was used to examine video-recorded treatment sessions. Analysis demonstrated that managing physical incompetence forms an important element of the organisation of these interactions. Through their conduct, patients and therapists limit and counter its various negative implications, including those which attribute it to failure of a patient's efforts, co-operation and personal competence, and failure of therapy. Understanding orientations to incompetence and their influence upon interactions provides some explanations, or ‘good reasons’, for certain features of clinical interactions that have attracted criticism. Analysis also shows how management of incompetence is grounded in the clinician's authority and contributes to its maintenance. | |Abstract=Patients’ physical incompetence is a feature of many clinical interactions; the challenges it presents are not only technical but also interactional. This paper examines how interpretations and interactional consequences of physical incompetence are dealt with during stroke physiotherapy. A conversation analytic approach was used to examine video-recorded treatment sessions. Analysis demonstrated that managing physical incompetence forms an important element of the organisation of these interactions. Through their conduct, patients and therapists limit and counter its various negative implications, including those which attribute it to failure of a patient's efforts, co-operation and personal competence, and failure of therapy. Understanding orientations to incompetence and their influence upon interactions provides some explanations, or ‘good reasons’, for certain features of clinical interactions that have attracted criticism. Analysis also shows how management of incompetence is grounded in the clinician's authority and contributes to its maintenance. | ||
Latest revision as of 00:50, 1 November 2019
| Parry2004 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Parry2004 |
| Author(s) | Ruth H. Parry |
| Title | The interactional management of patients' physical incompetence: a conversation analytic study of physiotherapy interactions |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Medical EMCA, Incompetence, Physiotherapy |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2004 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Sociology of Health & Illness |
| Volume | 26 |
| Number | 7 |
| Pages | 976–1007 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00425.x |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Patients’ physical incompetence is a feature of many clinical interactions; the challenges it presents are not only technical but also interactional. This paper examines how interpretations and interactional consequences of physical incompetence are dealt with during stroke physiotherapy. A conversation analytic approach was used to examine video-recorded treatment sessions. Analysis demonstrated that managing physical incompetence forms an important element of the organisation of these interactions. Through their conduct, patients and therapists limit and counter its various negative implications, including those which attribute it to failure of a patient's efforts, co-operation and personal competence, and failure of therapy. Understanding orientations to incompetence and their influence upon interactions provides some explanations, or ‘good reasons’, for certain features of clinical interactions that have attracted criticism. Analysis also shows how management of incompetence is grounded in the clinician's authority and contributes to its maintenance.
In the face of failures of physical competence, participants collaboratively and continually work to portray patients as deserving of treatment rather than sanction, and to convey that despite evident difficulties, the therapeutic process is a co-operative and successful endeavour. The paper examines how these meanings are addressed and accomplished through interaction
Notes
