Difference between revisions of "Glenn2003c"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Phillip Glenn; |Title=On Sexism in Conversational Joking |Tag(s)=EMCA; sexism; laughter; Jokes; |Key=Glenn2003c |Year=2003 |Language=E...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Phillip Glenn;  
+
|Author(s)=Phillip Glenn;
 
|Title=On Sexism in Conversational Joking
 
|Title=On Sexism in Conversational Joking
|Tag(s)=EMCA; sexism; laughter; Jokes;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; sexism; laughter; Jokes;
 
|Key=Glenn2003c
 
|Key=Glenn2003c
 
|Year=2003
 
|Year=2003
Line 11: Line 11:
 
|Number=5
 
|Number=5
 
|URL=http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0311/1-glenn-feature-sexism.php
 
|URL=http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0311/1-glenn-feature-sexism.php
 +
|Abstract=Sometimes people engage in joking talk that might be characterized as blatantly sexist. A judgmental label such as "sexist" does not mean the same thing to different people. I've picked instances of joking that I think most readers would judge as sexist. That is not a claim that the participants themselves orient to the talk as sexist; or if they did, that they would agree that such joking is problematic. Indeed, one purpose of undertaking such analysis is to attempt to characterize what the talk is and what it is doing for its producers in the first place. What do people accomplish in and through joking based on negative sexual stereotypes?
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 06:55, 8 July 2018

Glenn2003c
BibType ARTICLE
Key Glenn2003c
Author(s) Phillip Glenn
Title On Sexism in Conversational Joking
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, sexism, laughter, Jokes
Publisher
Year 2003
Language English
City
Month
Journal M/C - A Journal of Media and Culture
Volume 6
Number 5
Pages
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Sometimes people engage in joking talk that might be characterized as blatantly sexist. A judgmental label such as "sexist" does not mean the same thing to different people. I've picked instances of joking that I think most readers would judge as sexist. That is not a claim that the participants themselves orient to the talk as sexist; or if they did, that they would agree that such joking is problematic. Indeed, one purpose of undertaking such analysis is to attempt to characterize what the talk is and what it is doing for its producers in the first place. What do people accomplish in and through joking based on negative sexual stereotypes?

Notes