Difference between revisions of "Weiste2016"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (Text replace - "Conversation analysis;" to "Conversation Analysis;")
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Elina Weiste;
 
|Author(s)=Elina Weiste;
 
|Title=Formulations in occupational therapy: Managing talk about psychiatric outpatients’ emotional states
 
|Title=Formulations in occupational therapy: Managing talk about psychiatric outpatients’ emotional states
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation analysis; Institutional interaction; Psychiatry; Occupational therapy; Formulation; Emotion; EMCA;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Institutional interaction; Psychiatry; Occupational therapy; Formulation; Emotion; EMCA;  
 
|Key=Weiste2016
 
|Key=Weiste2016
 
|Year=2016
 
|Year=2016

Revision as of 16:11, 14 May 2018

Weiste2016
BibType ARTICLE
Key Weiste2016
Author(s) Elina Weiste
Title Formulations in occupational therapy: Managing talk about psychiatric outpatients’ emotional states
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Institutional interaction, Psychiatry, Occupational therapy, Formulation, Emotion, EMCA
Publisher
Year 2016
Language
City
Month
Journal Journal of Pragmatics
Volume 105
Number
Pages 59 - 73
URL Link
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.08.007
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Abstract Working with clients’ emotional states is important in psychiatric care. The clients’ conditions often involve non-adaptive emotions or difficulties in emotion regulation. However, the clinicians in mainstream psychiatry also need to focus on other activities, such as solutions to problems of daily life. How do clinicians balance between emotional alignment with the client and other, more practical tasks? Based on conversation analysis of 15 video-recorded occupational therapy encounters at a psychiatric outpatient clinic, this article analyses two types of formulation sequences that the clinicians use for managing talk related to the clients’ emotional states. In the first, the clients describe their emotional states from a perspective of competence and the clinicians endorse that perspective. In the second, the clients take a negative stance towards their experiences and the clinicians’ formulations attend to the clients’ troublesome experiences. Immediately after the formulations, the clinicians redirect the talk, often occurring through the clinicians’ mention of a different topic to the one currently being discussed by the client. The article contributes to research on institutional interaction and emotions in interaction by describing how the management of talk on emotions in occupational therapy encounters of psychiatric care combines interactional features of psychotherapeutic and medical work.

Notes