Difference between revisions of "Mondada2013g"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Booktitle=Space in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional and Cognitive Perspectives | |Booktitle=Space in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional and Cognitive Perspectives | ||
|Pages=247–275 | |Pages=247–275 | ||
| + | |URL=https://www.degruyter.com/view/books/9783110312027/9783110312027.247/9783110312027.247.xml | ||
|DOI=10.1515/9783110312027.247 | |DOI=10.1515/9783110312027.247 | ||
| − | |Abstract= | + | |Abstract=This paper highlights some of the ways in which the concept of interactional space can contribute to conversation analysis, ethnomethodology and interactional linguistics. As I use it (Mondada 2005, 2007a, 2009a), the concept draws on the work of Erving Goffman, Adam Kendon and Charles Goodwin. The paper takes into consideration, within the detailed description of turns at talk and of talk-and-other-conducts-in-interaction, the relevance of participants’ bodies as arranged in the material surroundings in which their social activities take place. Interactional space contributes to our understanding of phenomena studied both by Conversation Analysis (such as the sequential organization of action, the organization of participation and the organization of turns) and by Interactional Linguistics (such as linguistic projections, the emergent construction of turns, grammar as a situated set of resources). |
| − | This paper highlights some of the ways in which the concept of interactional | ||
| − | space can contribute to conversation analysis, ethnomethodology and interactional | ||
| − | linguistics. As I use it (Mondada 2005, 2007a, 2009a), the concept | ||
| − | draws on the work of Erving Goffman, Adam Kendon and Charles Goodwin. | ||
| − | The paper takes into consideration, within the detailed description of | ||
| − | turns at talk and of talk-and-other-conducts-in-interaction, the relevance of | ||
| − | participants’ bodies as arranged in the material surroundings in which their | ||
| − | social activities take place. Interactional space contributes to our understanding | ||
| − | of phenomena studied both by Conversation Analysis (such as the | ||
| − | sequential organization of action, the organization of participation and the | ||
| − | organization of turns) and by Interactional Linguistics (such as linguistic | ||
| − | projections, the emergent construction of turns, grammar as a situated set of | ||
| − | resources). | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:49, 4 December 2019
| Mondada2013g | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Mondada2013g |
| Author(s) | Lorenza Mondada |
| Title | Interactional space and the study of embodied talk-interaction |
| Editor(s) | Peter Auer, Martin Hilpert, Anja Stukenbrock, Bernd Szmrecsanyi |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Space, Embodiment |
| Publisher | De Gruyter |
| Year | 2013 |
| Language | |
| City | Berlin |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 247–275 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1515/9783110312027.247 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Space in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional and Cognitive Perspectives |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper highlights some of the ways in which the concept of interactional space can contribute to conversation analysis, ethnomethodology and interactional linguistics. As I use it (Mondada 2005, 2007a, 2009a), the concept draws on the work of Erving Goffman, Adam Kendon and Charles Goodwin. The paper takes into consideration, within the detailed description of turns at talk and of talk-and-other-conducts-in-interaction, the relevance of participants’ bodies as arranged in the material surroundings in which their social activities take place. Interactional space contributes to our understanding of phenomena studied both by Conversation Analysis (such as the sequential organization of action, the organization of participation and the organization of turns) and by Interactional Linguistics (such as linguistic projections, the emergent construction of turns, grammar as a situated set of resources).
Notes
