Difference between revisions of "OGrady-Dahm-Roger-Yates2014"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (SaulAlbert moved page O'Grady-Dahm-Roger-Yates2014 to OGrady-Dahm-Roger-Yates2014: Pages shouldn't have apostrophes in the title or it messes with the BibTeX export functions of the site...) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Catherine O'Grady; Maria R Dahm; Peter Roger; Lynda Yates | + | |Author(s)=Catherine O'Grady; Maria R. Dahm; Peter Roger; Lynda Yates |
|Title=Trust, talk and the dictaphone: Tracing the discursive accomplishment of trust in a surgical consultation | |Title=Trust, talk and the dictaphone: Tracing the discursive accomplishment of trust in a surgical consultation | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; Trust; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; Trust; | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Journal=Discourse & Society | |Journal=Discourse & Society | ||
|Volume=25 | |Volume=25 | ||
| − | |Pages=65- | + | |Number=1 |
| + | |Pages=65–83 | ||
| + | |URL=http://das.sagepub.com/content/25/1/65 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1177/0957926513496354 | ||
| + | |Abstract=Using discourse analytical methods, this article examines the interactional accomplishment of trust. Focusing on a case study drawn from a corpus of 28 surgical consultations collected in a gastro-intestinal clinic, it traces the trust-building process in a specific, communicatively challenging encounter where the patient is seeking a second opinion following an operation that she deems unsuccessful. Discourse analytical findings make visible the doctor’s strategic interactional work to build interpersonal trust with the patient and to regain her trust in the surgical profession. This work extends beyond interaction with the patient to include dictation of a letter to the referring doctor in the patient’s presence. Close analysis of the encounter reveals how this co-constructed consultation letter is deployed to strengthen the fragile patient–doctor trust engendered thus far. The article therefore provides insights into the discursive processes of trust building that could potentially be of considerable practical relevance to the medical profession. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 13:58, 9 March 2016
| OGrady-Dahm-Roger-Yates2014 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | OGrady-Dahm-Roger-Yates2014 |
| Author(s) | Catherine O'Grady, Maria R. Dahm, Peter Roger, Lynda Yates |
| Title | Trust, talk and the dictaphone: Tracing the discursive accomplishment of trust in a surgical consultation |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Medical EMCA, Trust |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2014 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse & Society |
| Volume | 25 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 65–83 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/0957926513496354 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Using discourse analytical methods, this article examines the interactional accomplishment of trust. Focusing on a case study drawn from a corpus of 28 surgical consultations collected in a gastro-intestinal clinic, it traces the trust-building process in a specific, communicatively challenging encounter where the patient is seeking a second opinion following an operation that she deems unsuccessful. Discourse analytical findings make visible the doctor’s strategic interactional work to build interpersonal trust with the patient and to regain her trust in the surgical profession. This work extends beyond interaction with the patient to include dictation of a letter to the referring doctor in the patient’s presence. Close analysis of the encounter reveals how this co-constructed consultation letter is deployed to strengthen the fragile patient–doctor trust engendered thus far. The article therefore provides insights into the discursive processes of trust building that could potentially be of considerable practical relevance to the medical profession.
Notes
