Difference between revisions of "Stokoe-Speer2018"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Sexuality; Identity; Applied; Ethnomethodology | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Sexuality; Identity; Applied; Ethnomethodology | ||
|Key=Stokoe-Speer2018 | |Key=Stokoe-Speer2018 | ||
| + | |Publisher=Oxford University Press | ||
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
| − | |Booktitle=The Oxford | + | |Language=English |
| + | |Address=New York | ||
| + | |Booktitle=The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality | ||
| + | |URL=https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/42645/chapter-abstract/358157927 | ||
|DOI=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.013.7 | |DOI=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.013.7 | ||
| − | |Abstract=This chapter describes and illustrates a conversation analytic approach to language and | + | |Abstract=This chapter describes and illustrates a conversation analytic approach to language and sexuality. We start by exploring contrasts between conversation analytic and other approaches to connecting language as a practice and sexuality as an identity topic. We set this discussion in a broader ethnomethodological context, drawing out key themes and debates that have emerged since the inception of ethnomethodological approaches to the study of gender and sexuality in the 1960s, including notions such as ‘doing’ gender and sexuality and ‘passing’. We review briefly the controversial debates about the analytic tractability of identity topics, like sexuality and gender, in the conversation analytic tradition. After summarizing conversation analytic work on sexuality specifically, we illustrate what this approach offers to language and sexuality scholars, showing the methodological steps involved as well as the possibilities for applying findings in the real world beyond scholarly debate. |
| − | sexuality. We start by exploring contrasts between conversation analytic and other | ||
| − | approaches to connecting language as a practice and sexuality as an identity topic. We set this | ||
| − | discussion in a broader ethnomethodological context, drawing out key themes and debates | ||
| − | that have emerged since the inception of ethnomethodological approaches to the study of | ||
| − | gender and sexuality in the 1960s, including notions such as ‘doing’ gender and sexuality and | ||
| − | ‘passing’. We review briefly the controversial debates about the analytic tractability of | ||
| − | identity topics, like sexuality and gender, in the conversation analytic tradition. After | ||
| − | summarizing conversation analytic work on sexuality specifically, we illustrate what this | ||
| − | approach offers to language and sexuality scholars, showing the methodological steps | ||
| − | involved as well as the possibilities for applying findings in the real world beyond scholarly | ||
| − | debate. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:47, 25 August 2023
| Stokoe-Speer2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Stokoe-Speer2018 |
| Author(s) | Elisabeth Stokoe, Susan A. Speer |
| Title | Conversation analysis, language and sexuality |
| Editor(s) | Kira Hall, Rusty Barrett |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Sexuality, Identity, Applied, Ethnomethodology |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | New York |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.013.7 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This chapter describes and illustrates a conversation analytic approach to language and sexuality. We start by exploring contrasts between conversation analytic and other approaches to connecting language as a practice and sexuality as an identity topic. We set this discussion in a broader ethnomethodological context, drawing out key themes and debates that have emerged since the inception of ethnomethodological approaches to the study of gender and sexuality in the 1960s, including notions such as ‘doing’ gender and sexuality and ‘passing’. We review briefly the controversial debates about the analytic tractability of identity topics, like sexuality and gender, in the conversation analytic tradition. After summarizing conversation analytic work on sexuality specifically, we illustrate what this approach offers to language and sexuality scholars, showing the methodological steps involved as well as the possibilities for applying findings in the real world beyond scholarly debate.
Notes
