Difference between revisions of "Tseliou2018"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2018-08-21 02:35:16) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| + | |BibType=INCOLLECTION | ||
| + | |Author(s)=Eleftheria Tseliou; | ||
| + | |Title=Conversation analysis, discourse analysis and psychotherapy research: overview and methodological potential | ||
| + | |Editor(s)=Olga Smoliak; Tom Strong; | ||
| + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Discursive Psychology; DP; Therapy; Psychotherapy; Discourse Analysis; Methodology | ||
|Key=Tseliou2018 | |Key=Tseliou2018 | ||
| − | + | |Publisher=Palgrave Macmillan | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |Publisher= | ||
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
| + | |Address=Cham | ||
| + | |Booktitle=Therapy as Discourse: Practice and Research | ||
|Pages=163–186 | |Pages=163–186 | ||
| − | |URL=https:// | + | |URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-93067-1_8 |
|DOI=10.1007/978-3-319-93067-1_8 | |DOI=10.1007/978-3-319-93067-1_8 | ||
| + | |Abstract=My aim in this chapter is to discuss certain ways in which Conversation Analysis (CA) and Discourse Analysis (DA) can methodologically contribute to psychotherapy research, particularly concerning systemic/discursive therapies. The use of qualitative research methodologies remains limited in psychotherapy research. Furthermore, research of systemic/discursive therapies is in need of methodological advances to address the context-specific, interactional perspective about change, espoused by such models. Following a brief overview of the place of CA and DA in psychotherapy research, I discuss certain notions/methodological tools of CA and Discursive Psychology (DPsy), a trend of DA, which bear potential to address such need. I conclude with limitations and implications of the use of CA and DPsy for the future of psychotherapy research. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 06:00, 11 January 2020
| Tseliou2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Tseliou2018 |
| Author(s) | Eleftheria Tseliou |
| Title | Conversation analysis, discourse analysis and psychotherapy research: overview and methodological potential |
| Editor(s) | Olga Smoliak, Tom Strong |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Discursive Psychology, DP, Therapy, Psychotherapy, Discourse Analysis, Methodology |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | Cham |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 163–186 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-93067-1_8 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Therapy as Discourse: Practice and Research |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
My aim in this chapter is to discuss certain ways in which Conversation Analysis (CA) and Discourse Analysis (DA) can methodologically contribute to psychotherapy research, particularly concerning systemic/discursive therapies. The use of qualitative research methodologies remains limited in psychotherapy research. Furthermore, research of systemic/discursive therapies is in need of methodological advances to address the context-specific, interactional perspective about change, espoused by such models. Following a brief overview of the place of CA and DA in psychotherapy research, I discuss certain notions/methodological tools of CA and Discursive Psychology (DPsy), a trend of DA, which bear potential to address such need. I conclude with limitations and implications of the use of CA and DPsy for the future of psychotherapy research.
Notes
