Difference between revisions of "Greiffenhagen2008"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "Computer-Supported Cooperative Work" to "Computer Supported Cooperative Work") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
− | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
− | | | + | |Author(s)=Christian Greiffenhagen; |
|Title=Unpacking tasks: The fusion of new technology with instructional work | |Title=Unpacking tasks: The fusion of new technology with instructional work | ||
− | |||
|Tag(s)=CSCL; interaction; new technology; task; teaching and learning practices; EMCA; CSCW | |Tag(s)=CSCL; interaction; new technology; task; teaching and learning practices; EMCA; CSCW | ||
− | | | + | |Key=Greiffenhagen2008 |
|Year=2008 | |Year=2008 | ||
|Journal=Computer Supported Cooperative Work | |Journal=Computer Supported Cooperative Work | ||
Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
|Pages=35–26 | |Pages=35–26 | ||
− | |URL= | + | |URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10606-007-9068-x |
|DOI=10.1007/s10606-007-9068-x | |DOI=10.1007/s10606-007-9068-x | ||
|Abstract=This paper discusses how a new technology (designed to help pupils with learning about Shakespeare's Macbeth) is introduced and integrated into existing classroom practices. It reports on the ways through which teachers and pupils figure out how to use the software as part of their classroom work. Since teaching and learning in classrooms are achieved in and through educational tasks (what teachers instruct pupils to do) the analysis explicates some notable features of a particular task (storyboarding one scene from the play). It is shown that both 'setting the task' and 'following the task' have to be locally and practically accomplished and that tasks can operate as a sense-making device for pupils' activities. Furthermore, what the task 'is', is not entirely established through the teacher's initial formulation, but progressively clarified through pupils' subsequent work, and in turn ratified by the teacher. | |Abstract=This paper discusses how a new technology (designed to help pupils with learning about Shakespeare's Macbeth) is introduced and integrated into existing classroom practices. It reports on the ways through which teachers and pupils figure out how to use the software as part of their classroom work. Since teaching and learning in classrooms are achieved in and through educational tasks (what teachers instruct pupils to do) the analysis explicates some notable features of a particular task (storyboarding one scene from the play). It is shown that both 'setting the task' and 'following the task' have to be locally and practically accomplished and that tasks can operate as a sense-making device for pupils' activities. Furthermore, what the task 'is', is not entirely established through the teacher's initial formulation, but progressively clarified through pupils' subsequent work, and in turn ratified by the teacher. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 00:49, 21 November 2019
Greiffenhagen2008 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Greiffenhagen2008 |
Author(s) | Christian Greiffenhagen |
Title | Unpacking tasks: The fusion of new technology with instructional work |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | CSCL, interaction, new technology, task, teaching and learning practices, EMCA, CSCW |
Publisher | |
Year | 2008 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Computer Supported Cooperative Work |
Volume | 17 |
Number | 1 |
Pages | 35–26 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1007/s10606-007-9068-x |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This paper discusses how a new technology (designed to help pupils with learning about Shakespeare's Macbeth) is introduced and integrated into existing classroom practices. It reports on the ways through which teachers and pupils figure out how to use the software as part of their classroom work. Since teaching and learning in classrooms are achieved in and through educational tasks (what teachers instruct pupils to do) the analysis explicates some notable features of a particular task (storyboarding one scene from the play). It is shown that both 'setting the task' and 'following the task' have to be locally and practically accomplished and that tasks can operate as a sense-making device for pupils' activities. Furthermore, what the task 'is', is not entirely established through the teacher's initial formulation, but progressively clarified through pupils' subsequent work, and in turn ratified by the teacher.
Notes