Difference between revisions of "Bilmes1988"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jack Bilmes; |Title=The concept of preference in conversation analysis |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Preference; Methodology; |...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)=Jack Bilmes; | + | |Author(s)=Jack Bilmes; |
|Title=The concept of preference in conversation analysis | |Title=The concept of preference in conversation analysis | ||
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Preference; Methodology; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Preference; Methodology; |
|Key=Bilmes1988 | |Key=Bilmes1988 | ||
|Year=1988 | |Year=1988 | ||
|Journal=Language in Society | |Journal=Language in Society | ||
|Volume=17 | |Volume=17 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Number=2 |
− | |URL= | + | |Pages=161–181 |
− | |DOI= | + | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/concept-of-preference-in-conversation-analysis1/F08D66E6A77DCBBDB232B9A6E06A41F7 |
+ | |DOI=10.1017/S0047404500012744 | ||
+ | |Abstract=Preference is treated as a single concept in conversation analysis, but it has in fact developed into an assemblage of loosely related concepts. It has also been construed in a variety of mutually incompatible, and sometimes meth-odologically questionable, ways. This is due, at least in part, to a confusion between preference in its everyday usage and preference as a technical notion. This paper attempts to present a clear and unitary concept of preference and investigate the properties of that concept, differentiate related concepts (including conversational implicature), and reveal common confusions. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 10:16, 21 October 2019
Bilmes1988 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Bilmes1988 |
Author(s) | Jack Bilmes |
Title | The concept of preference in conversation analysis |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Preference, Methodology |
Publisher | |
Year | 1988 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Language in Society |
Volume | 17 |
Number | 2 |
Pages | 161–181 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1017/S0047404500012744 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
Preference is treated as a single concept in conversation analysis, but it has in fact developed into an assemblage of loosely related concepts. It has also been construed in a variety of mutually incompatible, and sometimes meth-odologically questionable, ways. This is due, at least in part, to a confusion between preference in its everyday usage and preference as a technical notion. This paper attempts to present a clear and unitary concept of preference and investigate the properties of that concept, differentiate related concepts (including conversational implicature), and reveal common confusions.
Notes