Stivers2015

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Stivers2015
BibType ARTICLE
Key Stivers2015
Author(s) Tanya Stivers
Title Coding social interaction: a heretical approach in Conversation Analysis?
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Coding, Conversation Analysis, Methodology
Publisher
Year 2015
Language
City
Month
Journal Research on Language and Social Interaction
Volume 48
Number 1
Pages 1–19
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/08351813.2015.993837
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Conversation Analysis has come to be the dominant approach to the systematic study of social interaction. Mixed methods studies combining CA with quantitative methods have been utilized since the 1980s to test associations between interaction practices and sociodemographic variables, attitudinal variables, outcomes, and even factors such as the economy. However, any sort of formal coding risks a massive reduction and flattening of complex human behavior to simplistic codes. Thus, a question arises as to whether it is possible to make use of formal coding in a way that remains true to CA principles about the study of social interaction. In this article, I argue that the formal coding of interaction behavior is not necessarily antithetical to conversation analysis. Although formal coding of interaction is frequently a top-down process that is not grounded in CA, interaction coding can be done in ways that do not sacrifice a CA sensibility and that are true to CA principles. In this article I discuss the aspects of CA methods that form a natural basis for formal coding and then go on to contrast non-CA-grounded formal coding with CA-grounded formal coding. Finally, I review some of the limitations of mixed methods CA formal coding studies of interaction. Data are in American and British English.

Notes