|Author(s)||Kobin H. Kendrick|
|Title||Evidential vindication in next turn: Using the retrospective “see?” in conversation|
|Editor(s)||Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O'Meara, Lila San Roque, Asifa Majid|
|Tag(s)||EMCA, Social action, Sequence organisation, Perception verbs, English, Disputes, Retro-sequences|
|Book title||Perception Metaphors|
Perception verbs are frequent in conversation across diverse languages and cultures. This chapter presents a case study of a recurrent but previously undocumented use of the perception verb see in everyday English conversation. Using conversation analysis, the chapter explicates the use of “See?” – the verb see produced with rising intonation as a possibly complete turn-constructional unit – as claim of evidential vindication. With “See?” a speaker claims a just prior turn, action, or event as support for a previous assertive action. The analysis demonstrates that the practice exploits two distinct forms of sequence organisation, adjacency pairs and retro-sequences, and reflects on the fit between the perception verb see and the action it implements within this practice.