Floyd2021
| Floyd2021 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Floyd2021 |
| Author(s) | Simeon Floyd |
| Title | Conversation and Culture |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Universals of interaction, Conversation analysis |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2021 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Annual Review of Anthropology |
| Volume | 50 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 219–240 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110158 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Conversation analysis is a method for the systematic study of interaction in terms of a sequential turn-taking system. Research in conversation analysis has traditionally focused on speakers of English, and it is still unclear to what extent the system observed in that research applies to conversation more generally around the world. However, as this method is now being applied to conversation in a broader range of languages, it is increasingly possible to address questions about the nature of interactional diversity across different speech communities. The approach of pragmatic typology first applies sequential analysis to conversation from different speech communities and then compares interactional patterns in ways analogous to how traditional linguistic typology compares morphosyntax. This article discusses contemporary literature in pragmatic typology, including single-language studies and multilanguage comparisons reflecting both qualitative and quantitative methods. This research finds that microanalysis of face-to-face interaction can identify both universal trends and culture-specific interactional tendencies.
Notes
