Ekberg2015

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Ekberg2015
BibType ARTICLE
Key Ekberg2015
Author(s) Katie Ekberg, Amanda LeCouteur
Title Clients' resistance to therapists' proposals: Managing epistemic and deontic status
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Psychotherapy, Client resistance, Epistemics, Deontics, Proposals
Publisher
Year 2015
Language English
City
Month
Journal Journal of Pragmatics
Volume 90
Number
Pages 12–25
URL Link
DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.004
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper uses conversation analysis (CA) to examine client resistance in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) sessions for clients with depression. Analysis focuses on clients' responses to therapists' proposals for behavioural change. Typically, clients displayed active resistance to such proposals by drawing on one of three types of 'inability to comply' account: (1) appeals to restrictive situational factors; (2) appeals to fixed physical states; (3) assertions of previous effort to do what the therapist was proposing. Each type of account involved clients utilising knowledge from personal experience as their reason for resisting the proposal. In formulating their accounts, clients' turns were designed in ways that displayed their epistemic stance in relation to the situation under discussion. By indexing their superior epistemic authority in the domain of their experience, clients were able to invoke their ultimate right to reject the therapist's proposed course of action. The implications for \CBT\ practice are discussed.

Notes