Dobbinson2016

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Dobbinson2016
BibType ARTICLE
Key Dobbinson2016
Author(s) Sushie Jayne Dobbinson
Title Systemizing and empathy in forensic ASD talk
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Autism, Empathy
Publisher
Year 2016
Language English
City
Month
Journal Advances in Autism
Volume 2
Number 4
Pages 179–190
URL Link
DOI 10.1108/AIA-05-2016-0013
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Purpose Since often missed in forensic care settings, little is known about how the ASD social and communication deficit impacts on rehabilitation work, particularly when accompanied by learning disability. This paper aims to show how Baron Cohen’s empathizing - systemizing theory can elucidate common processes in the interaction based risk-reduction work carried on between ASD forensic patients and their clinicians.

Design/methodology/approach Conversation Analysis is used to analyse the talk of two ASD men engaged in risk reduction work with their clinicians on a forensic learning disability ward in a medium secure psychiatric hospital in the UK. The clinicians include two forensic nurses and a speech and language therapist.

Findings Clinicians adapt to their patients’ systematic processes particularly with regard to helping them understand complex social phenomena such as others’ emotional displays and their understanding of empathy.

Practical implications Since ASD in forensic care is poorly researched, clinicians have little in the way of guidance about the interactive strengths and weaknesses of their ASD patients, despite risk reduction work being carried out by means of conversational interactions. This paper demonstrates some key aspects of ASD clinical interactions which may be used to inform treatment strategies elsewhere in the forensic establishment.

Originality/value By using Baron-Cohen’s Empathizing Systemizing theory in combination with Conversation Analysis, this paper aims to bring understanding of ASD interaction up to date. This is of particular importance for this poorly researched patient group, who, because of the way in which they differ to standard psychiatric patients, are at risk of being detained for lengthy periods where treatment strategies are not designed to fit their social and communicative profiles.

Notes