Crawley2022
| Crawley2022 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Crawley2022 |
| Author(s) | S. L. Crawley |
| Title | Queering Doing Gender: The Curious Absence of Ethnomethodology in Gender Studies and in Sociology |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Gender, Theory, Sociology, Ethnomethodology, Race, Sexuality |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2022 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Sociological Theory |
| Volume | 40 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 366–392 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/07352751221134828 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
“Doing Gender,” Candance West and Don Zimmerman’s famous 1987 article, has become a folk concept—a trope or commonsense resource within the sociology of gender. Yet at the same time, most gender scholars overlook its ethnomethodological premise, visible in both poststructuralist misunderstandings of its argument outside the discipline of sociology and what I term a realist misunderstanding of it in the study of structures and identities within the discipline. Reading West and Zimmerman queerly while clarifying ethnomethodology’s ontology, I refocus attention for critical scholarship on ethnomethodology’s analytic sensibilities for research on gender, race, and sexuality, among other embodiments. Specifically, ethnomethodology reframes a vision of actors as relational, practical actors; repositions gender as accountable, jointly produced social relations, not individual identity; and foregrounds resistance in addition to conformity. Hence, my gender (race/class/sexuality) is not mine; it is ours. Ethnomethodology’s ontological shift in temporality to reality-in-production enables interpretive-materialism: a queer, anti-racist, intersectional sociology that is future-facing and in motion.
Notes
