Buscariolli2023

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Buscariolli2023
BibType ARTICLE
Key Buscariolli2023
Author(s) André Buscariolli
Title Place formulations and the incongruity procedure: On police officers’ practices for assembling appearances of wrongdoing
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation analysis, Ethnomethodology, Place formulations, Police-civilian interaction, Policing
Publisher
Year 2023
Language English
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 25
Number 5
Pages 598–617
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/14614456231156516
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

‘Place’ is central to police work. Not only does the law prescribe proper uses of public spaces, but officers learn how to infer suspicion from people’s conduct and appearances at particular places. This article uses conversation analysis to examine how officers formulate place to render suspicious behavior accountably visible in their interactions with the public. Data come from recordings of police encounters in two American West Coast cities – the first dataset constitutes dashcam videos, and the second, videos recorded during ride-alongs. Findings suggest that officers use place formulations to (1) indicate violations in legally prescribed uses of space, (2) highlight incongruent elements in civilians’ conduct (e.g. proximity to incriminating objects), serving as a basis for inferring concealed wrongdoing, and (3) cast civilians’ presence in particular geographical areas as ‘out-of-place’. As place formulations do things in the interaction (i.e. accusing, questioning, accounting), the meaning officers ascribe to place is contingent upon ongoing courses of action.

Notes