Waring2012b

From emcawiki
Revision as of 09:02, 6 July 2019 by PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Hansun Zhang Waring; |Title=Yes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the language classroom |Tag(s)=EMCA; yes-no interrogatives...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Waring2012b
BibType ARTICLE
Key Waring2012b
Author(s) Hansun Zhang Waring
Title Yes-no questions that convey a critical stance in the language classroom
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, yes-no interrogatives, polar questions, teacher questions, classroom practices, adult ESL classroom, classroom discourse, conversation analysis
Publisher
Year 2012
Language English
City
Month
Journal Language and Education
Volume 26
Number 5
Pages 451-469
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Despite certain important critiques, much of the work on teacher questions has centered on the distinction between referential and display questions as well as their roles in creating more or less communicative classrooms. With some notable exceptions, few have delved into the specificity of how questions work in the details of classroom interaction. Based on 28 hours of videotaped adult ESL (English as a second language) classroom interaction collected in the United States, this conversation analytic study describes a particular type of yes-no questions used by teachers in environments where some sort of evaluation is relevant, the target of which varies (e.g. learner performance, textbook or a hypothetical linguistic construction). The yes-no question is used to convey a critical stance toward that target, as embodied in both the design and the receipt of these questions. Learners either align or dis-align with that stance. Dis-alignment transpires when the critical stance threatens concerns for learner competence or peer support. The findings contribute to prior literature on the nature of classroom discourse and teacher questions, and as such, can serve as a basis for illuminating and enhancing pedagogical practices.

Notes