Waring2008

From emcawiki
Revision as of 08:16, 1 July 2019 by PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Hansun Zhang Waring; |Title=Using Explicit Positive Assessment in the Language Classroom: IRF, Feedback, and Learning Opportunities |Tag...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Waring2008
BibType ARTICLE
Key Waring2008
Author(s) Hansun Zhang Waring
Title Using Explicit Positive Assessment in the Language Classroom: IRF, Feedback, and Learning Opportunities
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, ESL Learning, Conversation Analysis, Learning Theories, Teaching Methods, Applied Linguistics, ESL Instruction
Publisher
Year 2008
Language English
City
Month
Journal Modern Language Journal
Volume 92
Number 4
Pages 577-594
URL
DOI 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00788.x
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter
Error in widget Iframe: unable to write file /home2/ogviwsmy/public_html/emcawiki/extensions/Widgets/compiled_templates/wrt6623bbac4d24e5_78016893

Download BibTex

Abstract

Within the framework of sociocultural theory, learning is conceptualized as participation rather than acquisition (Donato, 2000). Given the governing metaphor of changing participation as learning (Young & Miller, 2004), an important contribution conversation analysis can make to the study of second language acquisition is to detail the instructional practices that either create or inhibit the opportunities for participation (Lerner, 1995), and by extension, the opportunities for learning. This study focuses on one such practice in English as a second language classrooms—the use of explicit positive assessment—and its relevance to learning opportunities. I argue that within certain contexts these assessments tend to suppress the opportunities for voicing understanding problems or exploring alternative correct answers, both of which are the stuff that learning is made of. The analysis suggests that what is sequentially and affectively preferred may be pedagogically and developmentally dispreferred.

Notes