Difference between revisions of "WahlinJacobsen-Abildgaard2020"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Christian Dyrlund Wåhlin-Jacobsen; Johan Simonsen Abildgaard |Title=Only the wearer knows where the shoe pinches? Deontics and epistemi...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m (AndreiKorbut moved page WahlinJacobsen-Abildgaard2019 to WahlinJacobsen-Abildgaard2020 without leaving a redirect) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Christian Dyrlund Wåhlin-Jacobsen; Johan Simonsen Abildgaard | |Author(s)=Christian Dyrlund Wåhlin-Jacobsen; Johan Simonsen Abildgaard | ||
|Title=Only the wearer knows where the shoe pinches? Deontics and epistemics in discussions of health and well-being in participatory workplace settings | |Title=Only the wearer knows where the shoe pinches? Deontics and epistemics in discussions of health and well-being in participatory workplace settings | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Deontics; Epistemics; Participation; Workplace studies; Health; Safety and well-being |
| − | |Key=WahlinJacobsen- | + | |Key=WahlinJacobsen-Abildgaard2020 |
| − | |Year= | + | |Year=2020 |
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Discourse & Communication | |Journal=Discourse & Communication | ||
| + | |Volume=14 | ||
| + | |Number=1 | ||
| + | |Pages=44–64 | ||
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1750481319876768 | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1750481319876768 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1177/1750481319876768 |
|Abstract=In participatory activities in the workplace, employees are invited to raise problems and suggest improvements to the management. Although it is widely acknowledged that employees rarely control decisions in these settings, little is known about the interactional resources that employees and managers draw upon when negotiating consensus about which initiatives to pursue in the future. We analyse interactions from participatory meetings in an industrial setting in relation to the topic of work shoes, showing how the participants orient to both their relative deontic rights (e.g. who can suggest and decide on initiatives) and epistemic rights (e.g. who can define a situation as problematic and assert what can be done about it). The analysis suggests that besides their low deontic status, employees’ fragile epistemic status constitutes an important but overlooked challenge to achieving improved working conditions through the participatory activities. | |Abstract=In participatory activities in the workplace, employees are invited to raise problems and suggest improvements to the management. Although it is widely acknowledged that employees rarely control decisions in these settings, little is known about the interactional resources that employees and managers draw upon when negotiating consensus about which initiatives to pursue in the future. We analyse interactions from participatory meetings in an industrial setting in relation to the topic of work shoes, showing how the participants orient to both their relative deontic rights (e.g. who can suggest and decide on initiatives) and epistemic rights (e.g. who can define a situation as problematic and assert what can be done about it). The analysis suggests that besides their low deontic status, employees’ fragile epistemic status constitutes an important but overlooked challenge to achieving improved working conditions through the participatory activities. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:21, 30 January 2020
| WahlinJacobsen-Abildgaard2020 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | WahlinJacobsen-Abildgaard2020 |
| Author(s) | Christian Dyrlund Wåhlin-Jacobsen, Johan Simonsen Abildgaard |
| Title | Only the wearer knows where the shoe pinches? Deontics and epistemics in discussions of health and well-being in participatory workplace settings |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Deontics, Epistemics, Participation, Workplace studies, Health, Safety and well-being |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2020 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse & Communication |
| Volume | 14 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 44–64 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1750481319876768 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In participatory activities in the workplace, employees are invited to raise problems and suggest improvements to the management. Although it is widely acknowledged that employees rarely control decisions in these settings, little is known about the interactional resources that employees and managers draw upon when negotiating consensus about which initiatives to pursue in the future. We analyse interactions from participatory meetings in an industrial setting in relation to the topic of work shoes, showing how the participants orient to both their relative deontic rights (e.g. who can suggest and decide on initiatives) and epistemic rights (e.g. who can define a situation as problematic and assert what can be done about it). The analysis suggests that besides their low deontic status, employees’ fragile epistemic status constitutes an important but overlooked challenge to achieving improved working conditions through the participatory activities.
Notes
