Difference between revisions of "Valkeapaa-etal2018"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Taina Valkeapää; Kimiko Tanaka; Camilla Lindholm; Elina Weiste; Melisa Stevanovic; |Title=Interaction, Ideology, and Practice in Menta...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health | |Journal=Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health | ||
| + | |Volume=6 | ||
| + | |Number=1 | ||
| + | |Pages=9-23 | ||
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-018-0131-3 | |DOI=https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-018-0131-3 | ||
|Abstract=This paper investigates how two ideologies of mental health rehabilitation—recovery ideol- | |Abstract=This paper investigates how two ideologies of mental health rehabilitation—recovery ideol- | ||
Revision as of 03:10, 10 August 2019
| Valkeapaa-etal2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Valkeapaa-etal2018 |
| Author(s) | Taina Valkeapää, Kimiko Tanaka, Camilla Lindholm, Elina Weiste, Melisa Stevanovic |
| Title | Interaction, Ideology, and Practice in Mental Health Rehabilitation |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Rehabilitation, Professional ideology, Joint decision-making, Conversation analysis, Social interaction |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health |
| Volume | 6 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 9-23 |
| URL | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-018-0131-3 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper investigates how two ideologies of mental health rehabilitation—recovery ideol- ogy and communal approach—are realized in interactional practices associated with psychosocial rehabilitation. More spesifically, the paper discusses employee selection in the context of the Clubhouse-created Transitional Employment (TE) programme, which offers employment opportunities for rehabilitants. The paper describes how joint decisions are established during the moment-by-moment interactional processes at the Clubhouse. Drawing from the data set of 29 video-recorded rehabilitation group meetings, and Conversation Analysis as a method, the paper analyzes two questions: (1) How do the participants talk about the decision-making process associated with the TE on a ‘‘meta’’ level? And (2) how are the TE employees actually selected in the turn-by-turn sequential unfolding of interaction? When discussing the TE employee selection procedure on a ‘‘meta’’ level, the values of recovery ideology focusing on client empowerment and self-determination are prevalent. Also, the central ideals of the communal approach—openness and collaboration—are defended as decision-making guidelines. However, in the meetings where decisions on the TE employees are concretely made, there is a mismatch between the two ideological approaches to rehabilitation and the actual practices observable in the relevant interactional encounters.
Notes
