Difference between revisions of "Valkeapaa-etal2018"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Taina Valkeapää; Kimiko Tanaka; Camilla Lindholm; Elina Weiste; Melisa Stevanovic; |Title=Interaction, Ideology, and Practice in Menta...")
 
m
 
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health
 
|Journal=Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health
 +
|Volume=6
 +
|Number=1
 +
|Pages=9-23
 
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-018-0131-3
 
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-018-0131-3
 
|Abstract=This paper investigates how two ideologies of mental health rehabilitation—recovery ideol-
 
|Abstract=This paper investigates how two ideologies of mental health rehabilitation—recovery ideol-

Latest revision as of 09:10, 10 August 2019

Valkeapaa-etal2018
BibType ARTICLE
Key Valkeapaa-etal2018
Author(s) Taina Valkeapää, Kimiko Tanaka, Camilla Lindholm, Elina Weiste, Melisa Stevanovic
Title Interaction, Ideology, and Practice in Mental Health Rehabilitation
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Rehabilitation, Professional ideology, Joint decision-making, Conversation analysis, Social interaction
Publisher Springer
Year 2018
Language English
City
Month
Journal Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health
Volume 6
Number 1
Pages 9-23
URL
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-018-0131-3
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper investigates how two ideologies of mental health rehabilitation—recovery ideol- ogy and communal approach—are realized in interactional practices associated with psychosocial rehabilitation. More spesifically, the paper discusses employee selection in the context of the Clubhouse-created Transitional Employment (TE) programme, which offers employment opportunities for rehabilitants. The paper describes how joint decisions are established during the moment-by-moment interactional processes at the Clubhouse. Drawing from the data set of 29 video-recorded rehabilitation group meetings, and Conversation Analysis as a method, the paper analyzes two questions: (1) How do the participants talk about the decision-making process associated with the TE on a ‘‘meta’’ level? And (2) how are the TE employees actually selected in the turn-by-turn sequential unfolding of interaction? When discussing the TE employee selection procedure on a ‘‘meta’’ level, the values of recovery ideology focusing on client empowerment and self-determination are prevalent. Also, the central ideals of the communal approach—openness and collaboration—are defended as decision-making guidelines. However, in the meetings where decisions on the TE employees are concretely made, there is a mismatch between the two ideological approaches to rehabilitation and the actual practices observable in the relevant interactional encounters.

Notes