Difference between revisions of "Tiitinen-Lempiala2022"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m (AndreiKorbut moved page Tiitinen-Lempiala2019 to Tiitinen-Lempiala2022 without leaving a redirect) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Sanni Tiitinen; Tea Lempiälä; | |Author(s)=Sanni Tiitinen; Tea Lempiälä; | ||
|Title=Two Social Functions of Stepwise Transitions When Discussing Ideas in Workplace Meetings | |Title=Two Social Functions of Stepwise Transitions When Discussing Ideas in Workplace Meetings | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Business meetings; Meetings; Idea development; Stepwise transitions; Workplace interactions | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Business meetings; Meetings; Idea development; Stepwise transitions; Workplace interactions |
| − | |Key=Tiitinen- | + | |Key=Tiitinen-Lempiala2022 |
| − | |Year= | + | |Year=2022 |
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=International Journal of Business Communication | |Journal=International Journal of Business Communication | ||
| + | |Volume=59 | ||
| + | |Number=3 | ||
| + | |Pages=355–384 | ||
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2329488418819132 | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2329488418819132 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1177/2329488418819132 |
|Abstract=Using conversation analysis and audio recordings of workplace meetings, we analyze stepwise transitions in discussions about ideas during meetings. We demonstrate that, in this context, stepwise transitions have functions related to maintaining cooperative social relationships by offering a way to (a) resist the presuppositions of the presented idea without explicit disagreement and (b) smoothly bypass ongoing or evolving disagreements when assessing the idea. Thus, the mundane view of stepwise transitions as a random disruption to meeting interactions is misleading. We discuss the results in relation to the literature on group interaction related to idea development and topic management and disagreements in workplace meetings. | |Abstract=Using conversation analysis and audio recordings of workplace meetings, we analyze stepwise transitions in discussions about ideas during meetings. We demonstrate that, in this context, stepwise transitions have functions related to maintaining cooperative social relationships by offering a way to (a) resist the presuppositions of the presented idea without explicit disagreement and (b) smoothly bypass ongoing or evolving disagreements when assessing the idea. Thus, the mundane view of stepwise transitions as a random disruption to meeting interactions is misleading. We discuss the results in relation to the literature on group interaction related to idea development and topic management and disagreements in workplace meetings. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:04, 4 June 2022
| Tiitinen-Lempiala2022 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Tiitinen-Lempiala2022 |
| Author(s) | Sanni Tiitinen, Tea Lempiälä |
| Title | Two Social Functions of Stepwise Transitions When Discussing Ideas in Workplace Meetings |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Business meetings, Meetings, Idea development, Stepwise transitions, Workplace interactions |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2022 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | International Journal of Business Communication |
| Volume | 59 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 355–384 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/2329488418819132 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Using conversation analysis and audio recordings of workplace meetings, we analyze stepwise transitions in discussions about ideas during meetings. We demonstrate that, in this context, stepwise transitions have functions related to maintaining cooperative social relationships by offering a way to (a) resist the presuppositions of the presented idea without explicit disagreement and (b) smoothly bypass ongoing or evolving disagreements when assessing the idea. Thus, the mundane view of stepwise transitions as a random disruption to meeting interactions is misleading. We discuss the results in relation to the literature on group interaction related to idea development and topic management and disagreements in workplace meetings.
Notes
