Difference between revisions of "Stefani2016"
(BibTeX auto import 2016-12-06 12:33:32) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
| − | | | + | |Author(s)=Elwys De Stefani; Paul Sambre; |
|Title=L'exhibition et la négociation du savoir dans les pratiques définitoires : L'interaction autour du syndrome de fatigue chronique dans un groupe d'entraide | |Title=L'exhibition et la négociation du savoir dans les pratiques définitoires : L'interaction autour du syndrome de fatigue chronique dans un groupe d'entraide | ||
| − | |||
|Tag(s)=(dis)agreement; Chronic Fatigue Syndrome; EMCA; epistemics; mutual help groups; practices of definition | |Tag(s)=(dis)agreement; Chronic Fatigue Syndrome; EMCA; epistemics; mutual help groups; practices of definition | ||
| − | | | + | |Key=Stefani2016 |
|Year=2016 | |Year=2016 | ||
|Journal=Langages | |Journal=Langages | ||
Revision as of 06:34, 6 December 2016
| Stefani2016 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Stefani2016 |
| Author(s) | Elwys De Stefani, Paul Sambre |
| Title | L'exhibition et la négociation du savoir dans les pratiques définitoires : L'interaction autour du syndrome de fatigue chronique dans un groupe d'entraide |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | (dis)agreement, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, EMCA, epistemics, mutual help groups, practices of definition |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2016 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Langages |
| Volume | 204 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 27–42 |
| URL | |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article analyses practices of definition observable in a mutual help group for people suffering from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). The authors apply the analytic tools offered by conversation analysis and propose an endogenous and situated description of the notion of definition. This approach allows the authors to conceive definitions as collective practices through which participants display and negotiate their knowledge and, ultimately, their right to define. Displays of agreement and disagreement appear to be fundamental in the dynamic and interactional achievement of a definition. The article is based on a corpus of interactions in Flemish Dutch.
Notes
