Difference between revisions of "Salomaa2023"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Elina Salomaa; Esa Lehtinen; |Title=Public note-taking on a digital platform as a workplace practice |Tag(s)=EMCA; Affordances; Digital...")
 
m
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Elina Salomaa; Esa Lehtinen;
 
|Author(s)=Elina Salomaa; Esa Lehtinen;
 
|Title=Public note-taking on a digital platform as a workplace practice
 
|Title=Public note-taking on a digital platform as a workplace practice
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Affordances; Digital technology; Note-taking; Multimodal conversation analysis; Workplace; In press
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Affordances; Digital technology; Note-taking; Multimodal conversation analysis; Workplace; Finnish
 
|Key=Salomaa2023
 
|Key=Salomaa2023
 
|Year=2023
 
|Year=2023
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Discourse Studies
 
|Journal=Discourse Studies
 +
|Volume=25
 +
|Number=6
 +
|Pages=775-798
 
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14614456231167734
 
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14614456231167734
 
|DOI=10.1177/14614456231167734
 
|DOI=10.1177/14614456231167734
 
|Abstract=Unlike traditional note-taking with pen and paper, in which the note-taking process is only partially accessible to the co-participants, note-taking in the digitalized workplace may be done publicly, so that both the content of notes and the process of writing them are observable to the co-participants. Using multimodally oriented conversation analysis, this study focused on public note-taking in interaction sequences where the facilitator of a workplace project records the results of a workshop discussion on a digital platform. The analysis revealed that while the facilitator was entitled to decide which portions of talk are recorded, the affordances of digital technology, its publicness in particular, enabled the co-participants to monitor the writing process, possibly leading to the editing of notes. The results show that even when note-taking is publicly performed, it is oriented to as an informal form of writing.
 
|Abstract=Unlike traditional note-taking with pen and paper, in which the note-taking process is only partially accessible to the co-participants, note-taking in the digitalized workplace may be done publicly, so that both the content of notes and the process of writing them are observable to the co-participants. Using multimodally oriented conversation analysis, this study focused on public note-taking in interaction sequences where the facilitator of a workplace project records the results of a workshop discussion on a digital platform. The analysis revealed that while the facilitator was entitled to decide which portions of talk are recorded, the affordances of digital technology, its publicness in particular, enabled the co-participants to monitor the writing process, possibly leading to the editing of notes. The results show that even when note-taking is publicly performed, it is oriented to as an informal form of writing.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 00:46, 18 November 2023

Salomaa2023
BibType ARTICLE
Key Salomaa2023
Author(s) Elina Salomaa, Esa Lehtinen
Title Public note-taking on a digital platform as a workplace practice
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Affordances, Digital technology, Note-taking, Multimodal conversation analysis, Workplace, Finnish
Publisher
Year 2023
Language English
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 25
Number 6
Pages 775-798
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/14614456231167734
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Unlike traditional note-taking with pen and paper, in which the note-taking process is only partially accessible to the co-participants, note-taking in the digitalized workplace may be done publicly, so that both the content of notes and the process of writing them are observable to the co-participants. Using multimodally oriented conversation analysis, this study focused on public note-taking in interaction sequences where the facilitator of a workplace project records the results of a workshop discussion on a digital platform. The analysis revealed that while the facilitator was entitled to decide which portions of talk are recorded, the affordances of digital technology, its publicness in particular, enabled the co-participants to monitor the writing process, possibly leading to the editing of notes. The results show that even when note-taking is publicly performed, it is oriented to as an informal form of writing.

Notes