Difference between revisions of "Ruehlemann-Gee2017"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Christoph Rühlemann; Matt Gee; |Title=Conversation Analysis and the XML method |Tag(s)=EMCA; XML; Quantification; XTranscript; XPath/XQ...") |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 06:59, 10 August 2019
| Ruehlemann-Gee2017 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Ruehlemann-Gee2017 |
| Author(s) | Christoph Rühlemann, Matt Gee |
| Title | Conversation Analysis and the XML method |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, XML, Quantification, XTranscript, XPath/XQuery |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion |
| Volume | 18 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 274-296 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this paper we introduce the XML method, a trio of technologies that can benefit conversation-analytic research. Specifically, we make a case for converting the cen- ter piece of CA research, the Jeffersonian transcript, into the format of the eXtensi- ble Mark-up Language (XML). XML essentially turns documents into hierarchi- cally ordered networks of nodes. As a network, an XML document can be exhaust- ively searched and any node or node set it contains can be extracted. We argue that the main benefit of formatting CA transcriptions in XML lies in the quantifiability that the format facilitates: CA-as-XML can provide precise "numbers and statistics" (Robinson 2007:65) thus helping to efficiently quantify observations and statisti- cally substantiate claims about the 'generalizability' of observed practices of social action. We also introduce XPath and XQuery, two related query languages designed to exploit the XML format. Further, we describe XTranscript, a free online tool developed to convert completed CA transcripts to XML. Central to our approach is that the methodology be accessible to linguistics of varying levels of technical ex- perience. Therefore, we also describe how this, and common concerns relating to the treatment of spoken data, have shaped our work in this area thus far.
Notes
