Difference between revisions of "Raymond2019a"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Chase Wesley Raymond |Title=Intersubjectivity, Normativity, and Grammar |Tag(s)=EMCA; conversation analysis (CA); ethnomethodology; infe...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
|Pages=182-204 | |Pages=182-204 | ||
| + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0190272519850781 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1177/0190272519850781 | ||
|Abstract=Interactants depend on background knowledge and commonsense inferences to establish and maintain intersubjectivity. This study investigates how the resources of language—or more specifically, of grammar—can be mobilized to address moments when such inferences might risk jeopardizing understanding in lieu of promoting it. While such moments may initially seem to undermine the normative commonsensicality of the particular inference(s) in question, the practice examined here is shown to legitimize those inferences through the very act of setting them aside. It is ultimately argued that grammar and other normative systems in social life (e.g., heteronormativity) mutually shape one another, with normative associations being routinely reconstituted as “by-products” in the pursuit of in-the-moment shared understanding. | |Abstract=Interactants depend on background knowledge and commonsense inferences to establish and maintain intersubjectivity. This study investigates how the resources of language—or more specifically, of grammar—can be mobilized to address moments when such inferences might risk jeopardizing understanding in lieu of promoting it. While such moments may initially seem to undermine the normative commonsensicality of the particular inference(s) in question, the practice examined here is shown to legitimize those inferences through the very act of setting them aside. It is ultimately argued that grammar and other normative systems in social life (e.g., heteronormativity) mutually shape one another, with normative associations being routinely reconstituted as “by-products” in the pursuit of in-the-moment shared understanding. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:21, 17 August 2023
| Raymond2019a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Raymond2019a |
| Author(s) | Chase Wesley Raymond |
| Title | Intersubjectivity, Normativity, and Grammar |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, conversation analysis (CA), ethnomethodology, inferences, language, (mis)understanding, social interaction |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Social Psychology Quarterly |
| Volume | 82 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 182-204 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/0190272519850781 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Interactants depend on background knowledge and commonsense inferences to establish and maintain intersubjectivity. This study investigates how the resources of language—or more specifically, of grammar—can be mobilized to address moments when such inferences might risk jeopardizing understanding in lieu of promoting it. While such moments may initially seem to undermine the normative commonsensicality of the particular inference(s) in question, the practice examined here is shown to legitimize those inferences through the very act of setting them aside. It is ultimately argued that grammar and other normative systems in social life (e.g., heteronormativity) mutually shape one another, with normative associations being routinely reconstituted as “by-products” in the pursuit of in-the-moment shared understanding.
Notes
