Quan-Ma2019

From emcawiki
Revision as of 07:42, 24 February 2020 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Lihong Quan; Jinlong Ma |Title=A study of repeat-formatted repair initiations in Mandarin Chinese conversation |Tag(s)=EMCA; Mandarin; E...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Quan-Ma2019
BibType ARTICLE
Key Quan-Ma2019
Author(s) Lihong Quan, Jinlong Ma
Title A study of repeat-formatted repair initiations in Mandarin Chinese conversation
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Mandarin, Epistemic stance, Epistemics, Repair, Repeats
Publisher
Year 2019
Language English
City
Month
Journal Chinese Language and Discourse
Volume 10
Number 2
Pages 158-186
URL Link
DOI https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.18014.qua
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Using the methodology of Conversation Analysis (or CA), this study examines three types of other-initiated repair initiators (henceforth OIs) that repeats some element in the trouble-source (henceforth repeats) in Chinese conversation: repeats suffixed with question particles ma (吗), repeats suffixed with question particles a (啊), and question-intonated repeats. It attempts to explore the differences between these typical formats, in terms of their forms/functions and the epistemic stance of the speaker who initiates repair. The main research findings indicate that question-intonated repeat implements an understanding check while repeat suffixed with question particles (ma or a) tends to serve different functions, in that, ma-suffixed repeat is inquiry-implicated while a-suffixed repeat contributes to constructing surprise, (dis)agreement or (dis)belief.

Notes