PinoJenkins2023

From emcawiki
Revision as of 04:25, 3 June 2023 by MarcoPino (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Marco Pino; Laura Jenkins; |Title=Inviting the patient to talk about a conversation they had with another healthcare practitioner: A way...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
PinoJenkins2023
BibType ARTICLE
Key PinoJenkins2023
Author(s) Marco Pino, Laura Jenkins
Title Inviting the patient to talk about a conversation they had with another healthcare practitioner: A way of promoting discussion about disease progression and end of life in palliative care interactions
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Medical CA, Healthcare interaction, End of life, Palliative care
Publisher
Year 2023
Language English
City
Month
Journal Health Communication
Volume
Number
Pages
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/10410236.2023.2185579
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Discussing disease progression is a core task in palliative care. This is especially important when there are indications that a patient considers their death as less imminent than the clinical team does. This article examines a communicative action that palliative medicine doctors use to address such discrepancies in knowledge and understanding of the patient’s prognosis: inviting the patient to talk about the contents of a conversation they had with another healthcare practitioner. The study used conversation analysis to examine five consultations in which this action was identified. These were part of a larger data set of 37 consultations recorded in a large UK hospice and involving patients with palliative care needs, sometimes accompanied by family or friends, and palliative medicine doctors. Findings are that the action of inviting the patient to talk about a previous conversation creates an opportunity for patients to articulate what they know and understand about their disease progression – but without requiring them to do so. Discussing such sensitive matters is thus made a matter of ‘opting in’ (rather than ‘opting out’). Doctors thereby avoid being interactionally accountable for directly initiating a potentially distressing topic. The article shows how the task of discussing disease progression and end of life is intertwined with the delicate management of patients’ displayed states of awareness regarding their disease progression. The study thus has practical implications by documenting ways in which clinicians can help patients realign their expectations about such delicate matters.

Notes