Difference between revisions of "Pino2020"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Title=Challenging generalisations: Leveraging the power of individuality in support group interactions |Tag(s)=EMCA; |Key=Pino2020 |Year=2020 |Lan...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| + | |Author(s)=Pino Marco | ||
|Title=Challenging generalisations: Leveraging the power of individuality in support group interactions | |Title=Challenging generalisations: Leveraging the power of individuality in support group interactions | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; | ||
| Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
|Year=2020 | |Year=2020 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| + | |Journal=Language in Society | ||
|URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/challenging-generalisations-leveraging-the-power-of-individuality-in-support-group-interactions/EDCF17D6DDBE825686F44142A3C9AE2F | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/challenging-generalisations-leveraging-the-power-of-individuality-in-support-group-interactions/EDCF17D6DDBE825686F44142A3C9AE2F | ||
|DOI=10.1017/S0047404520000603 | |DOI=10.1017/S0047404520000603 | ||
|Abstract=Explicit generalisations are statements that attribute a characteristic to all members of a social category (e.g. drug users). This article examines the tensions and negotiations that the use of generalisations prompts within support group interactions. Generalisations are practices for the cautious implementation of delicate actions. They can be used to convey perspectives on group members’ experiences by implication (without commenting on them directly), by virtue of those members belonging to the category to which a generalisation applies. At the same time, generalisations can misrepresent some individual cases within that category. Using conversation analysis, the article investigates how generalisations are deployed, challenged, and then defended in support group interactions. These analyses identify a tension between utilising the sense-making resources that category memberships afford, and the protection of its members from unwelcome generalisations.Data consist of recorded support-groupmeetings for people recovering from drug addiction (in Italy) and for bereaved people (in the UK). | |Abstract=Explicit generalisations are statements that attribute a characteristic to all members of a social category (e.g. drug users). This article examines the tensions and negotiations that the use of generalisations prompts within support group interactions. Generalisations are practices for the cautious implementation of delicate actions. They can be used to convey perspectives on group members’ experiences by implication (without commenting on them directly), by virtue of those members belonging to the category to which a generalisation applies. At the same time, generalisations can misrepresent some individual cases within that category. Using conversation analysis, the article investigates how generalisations are deployed, challenged, and then defended in support group interactions. These analyses identify a tension between utilising the sense-making resources that category memberships afford, and the protection of its members from unwelcome generalisations.Data consist of recorded support-groupmeetings for people recovering from drug addiction (in Italy) and for bereaved people (in the UK). | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:20, 21 August 2020
| Pino2020 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Pino2020 |
| Author(s) | Pino Marco |
| Title | Challenging generalisations: Leveraging the power of individuality in support group interactions |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2020 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0047404520000603 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Explicit generalisations are statements that attribute a characteristic to all members of a social category (e.g. drug users). This article examines the tensions and negotiations that the use of generalisations prompts within support group interactions. Generalisations are practices for the cautious implementation of delicate actions. They can be used to convey perspectives on group members’ experiences by implication (without commenting on them directly), by virtue of those members belonging to the category to which a generalisation applies. At the same time, generalisations can misrepresent some individual cases within that category. Using conversation analysis, the article investigates how generalisations are deployed, challenged, and then defended in support group interactions. These analyses identify a tension between utilising the sense-making resources that category memberships afford, and the protection of its members from unwelcome generalisations.Data consist of recorded support-groupmeetings for people recovering from drug addiction (in Italy) and for bereaved people (in the UK).
Notes
