Pilnick-Zayts2019

From emcawiki
Revision as of 08:46, 13 May 2019 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Alison Pilnick; Olga Zayts |Title=The power of suggestion: examining the impact of presence or absence of shared first language in the a...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Pilnick-Zayts2019
BibType ARTICLE
Key Pilnick-Zayts2019
Author(s) Alison Pilnick, Olga Zayts
Title The power of suggestion: examining the impact of presence or absence of shared first language in the antenatal clinic
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, In press, Prenatal care, Prenatal testing, Doctor-patient interaction, Midwifery, Decision-making
Publisher
Year 2019
Language English
City
Month
Journal Sociology of Health & Illness
Volume
Number
Pages
URL Link
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12888
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Healthcare encounters involving participants from diverse linguistic backgrounds are becoming more common due to the globalisation of health care and increasing migration levels. Research suggests that this diversity has a significant impact on health outcomes; however less is known about how it is managed in the actual consultation process. This article presents an analysis of antenatal screening consultations video recorded in Hong Kong, using conversation analysis. We consider how the use of a second or subsequent language impacts on these consultations, and on discussions and decisions about further action. The presence or absence of shared first language did not appear to affect the extent to which particular courses of action were promoted or recommended. Recommendations were a common occurrence across consultations with and without shared first language. However, we argue that the routine use of recommendations can be consequential, as second language speakers may have more limited resources to interrogate or contest these. This finding has implications for the ability for professionals to maximise patient involvement in decision‐making.

Notes