Difference between revisions of "Penn2016a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Claire Penn; Jennifer Watermeyer; Rhona Nattrass |Title=Managing language mismatches in emergency calls |Tag(s)=EMCA; South Africa; Tra...")
 
m (url)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|Title=Managing language mismatches
 
|Title=Managing language mismatches
 
in emergency calls
 
in emergency calls
|Tag(s)=EMCA; South Africa; Training; Emergency Calls; In press;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; South Africa; Training; Emergency Calls; In press;
 
|Key=Penn2016a
 
|Key=Penn2016a
 
|Year=2016
 
|Year=2016
 
|Journal=Journal of Health Psychology
 
|Journal=Journal of Health Psychology
 +
|URL=https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316636497
 
|DOI=10.1177/1359105316636497
 
|DOI=10.1177/1359105316636497
 
|Abstract=The complex linguistic profile of South Africa has the potential to limit the efficiency of emergency calls.
 
|Abstract=The complex linguistic profile of South Africa has the potential to limit the efficiency of emergency calls.

Revision as of 05:58, 27 September 2017

Penn2016a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Penn2016a
Author(s) Claire Penn, Jennifer Watermeyer, Rhona Nattrass
Title Managing language mismatches

in emergency calls

Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, South Africa, Training, Emergency Calls, In press
Publisher
Year 2016
Language
City
Month
Journal Journal of Health Psychology
Volume
Number
Pages
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/1359105316636497
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

The complex linguistic profile of South Africa has the potential to limit the efficiency of emergency calls. Emergency services depend on rapid resolution of a call, dispatch of an ambulance and response at scene. Resolving language mismatches is a critical feature of everyday practice in such a setting. This study examined accommodation to language shifts in a call centre using conversation analysis methods. Three main call trajectories were identified and the analysis suggested marked differences in responsivity, reflecting attitudinal and societal stratification. Conversation analysis provided insight into communication barriers and contextual features, which have implications for training.

Notes