Difference between revisions of "Ostermann2017"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Ana Cristina Ostermann; |Title=‘No mam. You are heterosexual’: Whose language? Whose sexuality? |Tag(s)=EMCA; Gender; language and s...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
|Pages=348–370 | |Pages=348–370 | ||
| − | |Abstract=This study analyzes phone calls to a Brazilian governmental health helpline. By | + | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/josl.12240 |
| − | means of Conversation Analysis and categorization analysis, it investigates a | + | |DOI=10.1111/josl.12240 |
| − | demographic survey at the end of the calls, used to collect information about | + | |Abstract=This study analyzes phone calls to a Brazilian governmental health helpline. By means of Conversation Analysis and categorization analysis, it investigates a demographic survey at the end of the calls, used to collect information about the caller, including the caller's sexual orientation. What was originally a wh-question (‘What is your sexual orientation?’) is most frequently transformed by call takers (who conduct the survey) into a polar question (‘Are you heterosexual?’), a format that triggers complex interactional trajectories and activates categorizations that demonstrate ‘in-action’ heteronormative understandings about gender and sexuality. The analysis reveals the helpline callers’ unfamiliarity with what academics and activists have mostly considered everyday and perhaps universal terminology, and thus calls for more bottom-up and ecologically valid ways of talking about sexual orientations. This investigation also contributes to questioning the traditional dichotomy of the micro and macro perspectives, demonstrating how situated interactions respond to a wider sociocultural repertoire which makes what is local simultaneously translocal. |
| − | the caller, including the | ||
| − | question (‘What is your sexual orientation?’) is most frequently transformed by | ||
| − | call takers (who conduct the survey) into a polar question (‘Are you | ||
| − | heterosexual?’), a format that triggers complex interactional trajectories and | ||
| − | activates categorizations that demonstrate ‘in-action’ heteronormative | ||
| − | understandings about gender and sexuality. The analysis reveals the helpline | ||
| − | callers’ unfamiliarity with what academics and activists have mostly | ||
| − | considered everyday and perhaps universal terminology, and thus calls for | ||
| − | more bottom-up and ecologically valid ways of talking about sexual | ||
| − | orientations. This investigation also contributes to questioning the traditional | ||
| − | dichotomy of the micro and macro perspectives, demonstrating how situated | ||
| − | interactions respond to a wider sociocultural repertoire which makes what is | ||
| − | local simultaneously translocal. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:05, 4 September 2023
| Ostermann2017 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Ostermann2017 |
| Author(s) | Ana Cristina Ostermann |
| Title | ‘No mam. You are heterosexual’: Whose language? Whose sexuality? |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Gender, language and sexuality, Conversation Analysis, Brazilian Portuguese, helpline, survey, heteronormativity, Membership Categorization Analysis |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Sociolinguistics |
| Volume | 21 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 348–370 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/josl.12240 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This study analyzes phone calls to a Brazilian governmental health helpline. By means of Conversation Analysis and categorization analysis, it investigates a demographic survey at the end of the calls, used to collect information about the caller, including the caller's sexual orientation. What was originally a wh-question (‘What is your sexual orientation?’) is most frequently transformed by call takers (who conduct the survey) into a polar question (‘Are you heterosexual?’), a format that triggers complex interactional trajectories and activates categorizations that demonstrate ‘in-action’ heteronormative understandings about gender and sexuality. The analysis reveals the helpline callers’ unfamiliarity with what academics and activists have mostly considered everyday and perhaps universal terminology, and thus calls for more bottom-up and ecologically valid ways of talking about sexual orientations. This investigation also contributes to questioning the traditional dichotomy of the micro and macro perspectives, demonstrating how situated interactions respond to a wider sociocultural repertoire which makes what is local simultaneously translocal.
Notes
