Difference between revisions of "Nakamura2018"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Kanae Nakamura |Title=“Late projectability” of Japanese turns revisited: Interrelation between gaze and syntax in Japanese conv...")
 
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|Title=“Late projectability” of Japanese turns revisited: Interrelation between gaze and syntax in Japanese conversations
 
|Title=“Late projectability” of Japanese turns revisited: Interrelation between gaze and syntax in Japanese conversations
 
|Editor(s)=Mutsuko Endo Hudson; Yoshiko Matsumoto; Junko Mori
 
|Editor(s)=Mutsuko Endo Hudson; Yoshiko Matsumoto; Junko Mori
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Japanese; Turn-taking; Gaze; Turn-transition; Projection; Pragmatics; Interactional Linguistics;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Japanese; Turn-taking; Gaze; Turn-transition; Projection; Pragmatics; Interactional Linguistics;
 
|Key=Nakamura2018
 
|Key=Nakamura2018
 +
|Publisher=John Benjamins
 
|Year=2018
 
|Year=2018
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
|Booktitle=Pragmatics of Japanese: Perspectives on grammar, interaction and culture
+
|Address=Amsterdam
|Pages=99-122
+
|Booktitle=Pragmatics of Japanese: Perspectives on Grammar, Interaction and Culture
|URL=https://benjamins.com/#catalog/books/pbns.285.04nak/details
+
|Pages=99–122
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.285.04nak
+
|URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/pbns.285.04nak
 +
|DOI=10.1075/pbns.285.04nak
 
|Abstract=Examining an interrelation between gaze and syntax in Japanese interaction, this study reveals the tendency that a speaker’s gaze shift to a recipient occurs in association with the final predicate of the turn-constructional unit (TCU), regardless of the grammatical form of the component following the predicate. The finding proposes that a speaker’s gaze projects an imminent onset of transition space in which a recipient may begin a next turn without being regarded as an interruption. While past studies highlighted the interactional significance of the utterance-final elements that “retroactively” mark the immediately preceding verb/adjective/nominal as the TCU-final predicate, this study uncovers that a speaker’s mid-TCU gaze shift serves as another resource to “proactively” mark the upcoming predicate as a TCU-final one.
 
|Abstract=Examining an interrelation between gaze and syntax in Japanese interaction, this study reveals the tendency that a speaker’s gaze shift to a recipient occurs in association with the final predicate of the turn-constructional unit (TCU), regardless of the grammatical form of the component following the predicate. The finding proposes that a speaker’s gaze projects an imminent onset of transition space in which a recipient may begin a next turn without being regarded as an interruption. While past studies highlighted the interactional significance of the utterance-final elements that “retroactively” mark the immediately preceding verb/adjective/nominal as the TCU-final predicate, this study uncovers that a speaker’s mid-TCU gaze shift serves as another resource to “proactively” mark the upcoming predicate as a TCU-final one.
 
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 12:36, 12 January 2020

Nakamura2018
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Nakamura2018
Author(s) Kanae Nakamura
Title “Late projectability” of Japanese turns revisited: Interrelation between gaze and syntax in Japanese conversations
Editor(s) Mutsuko Endo Hudson, Yoshiko Matsumoto, Junko Mori
Tag(s) EMCA, Japanese, Turn-taking, Gaze, Turn-transition, Projection, Pragmatics, Interactional Linguistics
Publisher John Benjamins
Year 2018
Language English
City Amsterdam
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 99–122
URL Link
DOI 10.1075/pbns.285.04nak
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title Pragmatics of Japanese: Perspectives on Grammar, Interaction and Culture
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Examining an interrelation between gaze and syntax in Japanese interaction, this study reveals the tendency that a speaker’s gaze shift to a recipient occurs in association with the final predicate of the turn-constructional unit (TCU), regardless of the grammatical form of the component following the predicate. The finding proposes that a speaker’s gaze projects an imminent onset of transition space in which a recipient may begin a next turn without being regarded as an interruption. While past studies highlighted the interactional significance of the utterance-final elements that “retroactively” mark the immediately preceding verb/adjective/nominal as the TCU-final predicate, this study uncovers that a speaker’s mid-TCU gaze shift serves as another resource to “proactively” mark the upcoming predicate as a TCU-final one.

Notes